MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2741600850

Comparative testing of high performance fabrics in the wet state

2015· article· en· W2741600850 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Martina Kulić, Maja Somogyi Škoc

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicTextile materials and evaluations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsHumanitiesArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Razvojem visokoucinkovitih tkanina i ispitivanjem njihove otpornosti na habanje normiranom metodom po Martindaleu doslo se do spoznaja da su one izuzetno otporne te da bi se postojeca metoda možda trebala modificirati. Glede uvjeta, uobicajeno se otpornost na habanje ispituje u suhom stanju, ali otpornost u mokrom ne, a niti se tome posvecuje dovoljna pažnja. Naime, visokoucinkovite tkanine se najcesce koriste za vojnu, policijsku, sportsku i sl. namjenu u vrlo zahtjevnim uvjetima koji su daleko od idealnih. Koliko puta vojnik ili alpinista pokisne, tada se njegov opasac s oružjem ili razlicitom opremom haba o odjecu i sl., cime ljudski život može biti ozbiljno ugrožen. U skladu s navedenim, podatak o otpornosti na habanje u mokrom stanju bio bi dobra smjernica o ponasanju i trajnosti koristenih visokoucinkovitih tekstilnih materijala u zahtjevnim uvjetima uporabe. U ovom radu provedeno je komparativno ispitivanje habanja visokoucinkovitih tkanina u suhom i mokrom stanju. Dobivena saznanja i rezultati uspoređivani su s rezultatima dobivenim normiranim postupkom, tj. postupkom ispitivanja otpornosti na habanje u suhom stanju (HRN EN ISO 12947-3:2008). Ispitivanje otpornosti na habanje u suhom i mokrom stanju provedeno je pri 1000, 5000, 25000, 50000 i 100000 ciklusa s ciljem dobivanja signifikantnih rezultata. Kao dodatan pokazatelj izracunat je relativni gubitak mase u mokrom stanju (fw). Habanje u suhom i mokrom stanju provedeno je na uzorcima visokoucinkovitih tkanina, tj. na uzorcima deklariranim kao Yukon, Cordura®, Puma, Themsa i Windmaster®. Navedenim uzorcima određene su osnovne konstrukcijske karakteristike.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.264
Threshold uncertainty score0.172

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.165
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTextile materials and evaluationsFrench-language works237,207