MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2741674151 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2017-3758

Abstract 3758: The efficacy of CD133 BiTEs and CAR-T cells in preclinical model of glioblastoma

2017· article· en· W2741674151 on OpenAlexaff
Parvez Vora, Chirayu Chokshi, Maleeha Qazi, Mohini Singh, Chitra Venugopal, Sujeivan Mahendram, Jarrett Adams, David Bakhshinyan, Max London, Jess Singh, Minomi Subapanditha, Nicole McFarlane, James Pan, Jonathan L. Bramson, Sachdev S. Sidhu, Jason Moffat, Sheila K. Singh

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCAR-T cell therapy research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAntigenPopulationFlow cytometryAntibodyPeripheral blood mononuclear cellImmunophenotypingCancer researchMonoclonal antibodyImmunologyChimeric antigen receptorMedicineCD3BiologyImmunotherapyCD8In vitroImmune system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) is a uniformly fatal primary brain tumor, characterized by a diverse cellular phenotype and genetic heterogeneity. Despite the use of multi-modal treatment including surgical resection, radiotherapy and chemotherapy, the outcome of patients with GBM remains poor. Numerous studies have implicated CD133+ brain tumor initiating cells (BTICs) as drivers of chemo- and radio-resistance in GBM. We recently demonstrated that a CD133-driven gene signature is predictive of poor overall survival and targeting CD133+ treatment-refractory cells may be an effective strategy to block GBM recurrence. Chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) and bispecific T-Cell engaging antibodies (BiTEs) present promising immunotherapeutic approaches that have not yet been validated for recurrent GBM. Using CellectSeq, a novel methodology that combines use of phage-displayed synthetic antibody libraries and DNA sequencing, we developed the CD133-specific monoclonal antibody ‘RW03’. We constructed CD133-specific BiTEs that consist of two arms; one arm recognizes the tumor antigen (CD133) while the second is specific to CD3 antigen. The dual binding specificity was confirmed using flow cytometry. Using CD133high and CD133low primary GBM lines, we validated the binding of BiTEs to CD133+ cells. Further analysis showed binding of BiTEs to human T cells known to express CD3 within a population of healthy donor peripheral blood mononuclear cells. We observed BiTEs redirecting T cells to kill GBMs, with greater efficiency observed in CD133high GBMs, validating BiTE target specificity. Incubating T-cells with BiTEs and the CD133high GBMs resulted in increased expression of T cell activation markers. In parallel, we derived the single chain variable fragment (scFv) from previously generated RW03 and generated a second-generation CAR. Anti-CD133 scFv with a myc tag was cloned in frame with a human CD8 leader sequence, CD8a transmembrane domain, CD28, and hCD3ζ signaling tail in the lentiviral construct pCCL-ΔNGFR. Following lentiviral packaging, the T cells isolated from PBMCs were transduced with CD133 CAR construct. After successful T cell engineering, the expression of ΔNGFR and myc tag was analyzed using flow cytometry to confirm the efficiency of transduction and surface expression of anti-CD133 respectively. CD133-specific CAR-T cells were cytotoxic to CD133+ GBMs. Co-culturing CD133 CAR-T cells with GBMs triggered T cell activation and proliferation. Treatment of GBM tumor-bearing mice with CD133-specific CAR-T cells yielded extended survival in mice and significant reductions in brain tumor burden. The results of this study will establish a translational research program that will form the basis of early phase clinical trials of a promising CD133-based therapeutic strategy for patients with GBM. Citation Format: Parvez Vora, Chirayu Chokshi, Maleeha Qazi, Mohini Singh, Chitra Venugopal, Sujeivan Mahendram, Jarrett Adams, David Bakhshinyan, Max London, Jess Singh, Minomi Subapanditha1,, Nicole McFarlane, James Pan, Jonathan Bramson, Sachdev Sidhu, Jason Moffat, Sheila Singh. The efficacy of CD133 BiTEs and CAR-T cells in preclinical model of glioblastoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 3758. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-3758

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.194
GPT teacher head0.494
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicCAR-T cell therapy research→French-language works237,207→