MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2741730683

DIET INDUCED OBESITY MAY AFFECT THE FORCE-VELOCITY RELATIONSHIP IN RAT SOLEUS

2015· article· en· W2741730683 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Myles Julian Borthwick, Kelsey H. Collins, Andrew Sawatsky, Sudeepta Aurka, Walter Herzog

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of undergraduate research in Alberta · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicChildren's Physical and Motor Development
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternal medicineEndocrinologySoleus muscleObesitySkeletal muscleMedicineChemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION Obesity is associated with chronic, low-grade inflammation that has been shown to affect several musculoskeletal tissues [1].  Previously, we observed that diet induced obesity (DIO) using a high-fat, high sugar diet results in molecular and morphological alterations in muscles, including an increase in intramuscular fat. However, it remains unclear if these alterations affect muscle function, as few studies have characterized the functional properties of muscles in obese individuals [2]. Arguably, one of the most important functional properties of skeletal muscle is the force-velocity relationship (FVR).  When muscles are shortening at increasing velocities, force decays exponentially as the proportion of attached cross bridges and the average force per cross-bridge decreases. As fat infiltration reduces the contractile material and structure of obese muscles, the functional properties of muscles, specifically the FVR may be affected. Therefore , the purpose of this study was to characterize the FVR in rat soleus muscles obtained from obese and normal rats. We hypothesized that soleus muscles of obese rats would produce lower absolute and relative forces at any given shortening velocity compared with muscles from control animals. METHODS Outbred, individually housed male Sprague-Dawley rats, aged 10-12 weeks, were randomized to a high fat, high sugar diet (DIO, 40% fat 45% sucrose, n=9) or a standard chow diet (n=5, chow, 12% fat, 0% sucrose) for 12 weeks. Prior to surgery, animals were sedated, weighed, and body composition was quantified using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. The right soleus muscle was exposed and a custom cuff-type electrode was implanted on the tibial nerve. The soleus tendon was isolated from the Achilles with the calcaneus attached and fixed to a motor along the muscle’s natural alignment. The muscle was then stretched to its optimum length and electrically stimulated at 35Hz at 2.5x the motor unit threshold [3]. An isometric force reading was acquired over 2.5 s stimulation. The soleus was then stretched past its optimum length and shortened at increasing velocities, a force reading was collected at optimal length using Windaq Software. Data were collected at 1000Hz. Forces during shortening were measured at the same length and time point as the isometric reference force. This process was repeated for shortening velocities increasing from 2 mm/s to 70 mm/s. Animals were sacrificed and soleus muscles were harvested and weighed. Data were processed using a custom Matlab ® zero-phase filter program. Instantaneous forces were normalized to the peak isometric force for each animal. Comparisons were made using a Student’s t-tests, α=0.05. RESULTS On average, DIO animals had higher body mass and body fat compared to the control rats (p Chow at each given velocity; p<0.05, Fig. 1). DISCUSSION The results opposed the expected outcomes of this study and, therefore, the hypothesis was not satisfied. These findings could be due to a higher proportion of fast twitch fibers in the DIO or longer fascicle lengths in the DIO rats, but these speculations remain to be tested. Another possible explanation involves a potential increase in sensitivity to stimulation in the DIO soleus muscle resulting in increased force. Future work will examine other structural levels and muscle contractile proteins to understand these preliminary findings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.139
GPT teacher head0.401
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of undergraduate research in AlbertaSame topicChildren's Physical and Motor DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207