MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Genome-wide association study (GWAS) of chemotherapy-induced Raynaud's phenomenon (RP) to reveal shared pathways with cardiovascular disease (CVD).

2017· article· en· W2741776602 on OpenAlexaff
Omar El Charif, Heather E. Wheeler, Matthew R. Trendowski, Eric R. Gamazon, Shirin Ardeshir‐Rouhani‐Fard, Darren R. Feldman, Robert J. Hamilton, David J. Vaughn, Clair J. Beard, Chunkit Fung, Jeri Kim, Sophie D. Fosså, Mohammad Issam Abu Zaid, Taisei Mushiroda, Michiaki Kubo, Lawrence H. Einhorn, Nancy J. Cox, Lois B. Travis, M. Eileen Dolan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGenome-wide association studyMedicineSNPInternal medicineOncologySingle-nucleotide polymorphismGenotypingGenetic associationGenotypeGeneticsBiologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

e18162 Background: RP is an adverse drug reaction characterized by reduced blood flow to the extremities causing pain and sensations of cold. Few studies have examined the genetic basis for RP, although family studies suggest a heritable component to primary RP. Methods: Eligible testicular cancer survivors (TCS) were < 55 y at diagnosis, treated with first line cisplatin-based chemotherapy, and completed questionnaires. Genotyping with standard quality control and imputation were performed. A case-control RP phenotype was derived from patient-reported outcomes and associations were computed by logistic regression. GWAS used cumulative bleomycin dose and 10 genetic principal components as covariates. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) utilized genes ranked by the most significant GWAS SNP in/within 20 kilobases. A polygenic risk score for CVD derived from four prior independent GWAS (Khera et al. NEJM 2016) was assessed for association with RP. Results: Of 749 patients (median age 38 y, median time since chemotherapy 5 y), 38% reported RP. Bleomycin dose was the most significant predictor of RP (OR100 mg/m2 = 1.25, p < 0.0001). Number of years smoking also correlated with RP (ORyear = 1.05, p = 0.002). Age and hypertension showed no significant correlation with RP. GSEA revealed several significant pathways (FDR q < 0.1), including “ cellular response to VEGF stimulus” (q = 0.05) and “ cardiac muscle cell action potential” (q = 0.09). We hypothesized that RP may share genetic architecture with CVD. Deriving a polygenic risk score from genome-wide significant SNPs in prior CVD GWAS (n = 4260-22,389), we showed nearly significant case-control differences in CVD polygenic risk score (two-tailed t-test, p = 0.053). RP frequency significantly increased with polygenic risk score quartile (OR = 1.19, p = 0.008). Conclusions: Over one third of TCS report RP, with greater frequency among bleomycin-treated patients and smokers. Implicated genetic pathways include ones established in CVD. Although shared genetic risk between chemotherapy-induced RP and CVD may be possible, further investigation is required. Primary RP has been inconsistently linked with CVD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.120
GPT teacher head0.417
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicCancer Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207