Prostate carcinoma with amphicrine features: further refining the spectrum of neuroendocrine differentiation in tumours of primary prostatic origin?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIMS: The current World Health Organization classification categorises high-grade neuroendocrine (NE) carcinomas of the prostate into small-cell and large-cell types. A distinct form of carcinoma showing synchronous dual exocrine and NE differentiation, termed amphicrine carcinoma, has been described at various other sites, primarily within the gastrointestinal tract. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinicopathological features of a series of metastatic prostate carcinoma (PCa) cases with amphicrine features. METHODS AND RESULTS: Five cases of high-grade PCa showing an amphicrine immunohistochemical phenotype were prospectively collected. The serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level at diagnosis ranged from 38 ng/ml to 992 ng/ml (median 200 ng/ml). All five patients had metastatic disease, four at initial presentation. Microscopically, the tumours showed a solid/nested growth pattern composed of cells with amphophilic cytoplasm, vesicular nuclei, and macronucleoli. Morphological features of small-cell or large-cell NE carcinoma were absent. As compared with conventional high-grade PCa, the tumour cells showed a higher level of nuclear pleomorphism, brisk mitotic activity, and a high Ki67 proliferation index (median 50%). All cases showed immunohistochemical positivity for PSA, androgen receptor, and prostate-specific acid phosphatase, combined with diffuse or confluent/non-focal positivity for chromogranin-A and synaptophysin. Two hormone-naive cases showed a clinical response to androgen deprivation therapy. CONCLUSION: This series highlights a previously undefined, clinically aggressive variant of PCa showing dual exocrine and NE differentiation, for which we are proposing the term PCa with amphicrine features. Increased recognition of these tumours may lead to a better understanding of their biology, and ultimately improve their clinical management.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".