MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2741945807 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2017-4336

Abstract 4336: Human mesodermal-derived CNS metastasis-associated stromal cells induce a fibrotic response to limit tumor growth

2017· article· en· W2741945807 on OpenAlexaff
Christophe Legendre, Gerald Gooden, Kyle N. Johnson, Rae Anne Martinez, Mark Bernstein, Jennifer Glen, Jeffrey Kiefer, Aleksander Hinek, Steven A. Toms, Bodour Salhia

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBrain Metastases and Treatment
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyStromal cellCancer researchDNA methylationMetastasisEpigeneticsMesenchymal stem cellSomatic cellExtracellular matrixCancerPathologyTGFBICell biologyGeneMedicineGene expressionGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Metastasis to the central nervous system (CNS) remains a major cause of mortality and morbidity in patients with systemic cancer. However, the mechanistic interactions of the neural niche with disseminated tumors cells in CNS metastases (CM) are still poorly understood. To better understand the cross-talk between the neural niche and metastatic tumors, we generated five different patient-derived cell lines (PDCs) originating from surgically resected CM. To assess the genetic and epigenetic characteristics of each PDC, DNA and RNA sequencing, and DNA methylation analysis was performed. Non-tumoral PDCs revealed normal copy number profiles, and retention of germline mutations as seen in patient-matched germline DNA. In contrast, one PDC (CM04) resembled its patient tumor, showing numerous copy number and somatic alterations. RNA-seq and DNA methylation analysis demonstrated that non-tumoral PDCs highly resembled each other, suggestive of a common cell of origin. Additionally, PDCs revealed gene expression signatures associated with cancer associated fibroblasts, epithelial to mesenchymal transition, and mesenchymal stem cells. Further in vivo studies demonstrated that CM04 cells were tumorigenic, whereas non-tumoral PDC (CM08) cells were unable to form tumors in mice. However, CM04:CM08 mixed tumors were significantly smaller than CM04 only tumors and revealed induction of a fibrotic response by immunohistochemistry. These data offer the first evidence that CNS metastasis-associated stromal cells (cMASCs) produce a collagen and fibronectin-rich extracellular matrix constituting a protective host response, which impedes growth of tumor cells. The therapeutic potential of these cells merits further exploration. Citation Format: Christophe Legendre, Gerald C. Gooden, Kyle N. Johnson, Rae Anne Martinez, Mark Bernstein, Jennifer Glen, Jeffrey Kiefer, Aleksander Hinek, Steven A. Toms, Bodour Salhia. Human mesodermal-derived CNS metastasis-associated stromal cells induce a fibrotic response to limit tumor growth [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4336. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-4336

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.151
GPT teacher head0.438
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicBrain Metastases and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207