MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2742418479 · doi:10.1016/j.sjpain.2017.04.032

Evaluating the ability of non-rectangular electrical pulse forms to preferentially activate nociceptive fibers by comparing perception thresholds

2017· article· en· W2742418479 on OpenAlex
Rósa Hugosdóttir, Carsten Dahl Mørch, Ole Kæseler Andersen, Þórður Helgason, Lars Arendt‐Nielsen

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueScandinavian Journal of Pain · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPain Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNociceptionPulse (music)ElectrodeMedicineStimulationMaterials scienceBiomedical engineeringInternal medicineChemistryOpticsPhysicsReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Aims Selective activation of nociceptive fibers is difficult using electrical stimulation as the activation threshold is higher than for non-nociceptive fibers. It remains unclear to what extent accommodation of non-nociceptive fibers during slowly rising electrical pulses can be utilized to reverse this activation order. The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of different pulse forms to activate nociceptive fibers with minimal co-activation of non-nociceptive fibers by comparing subjective perception thresholds (PT). Methods Electrical pulses were applied on the volar forearm of 25 subjects with (1) small diameter pin electrodes providing high current density in the skin epidermis, where primarily nociceptive fibers terminate and (2) standard patch electrodes (2.63 cm 2 ). PTs were obtained for exponential current increase, linear current increase, increasing form of exponential current decay (ED), and standard rectangular current pulses. All pulse forms were tested at two relatively long durations (5 and 50 ms). The PT ratio between patch- and pin electrode was calculated as an estimate of the ability of a pulse form to preferentially activate nociceptive fibers. The short form McGill pain questionnaire (SF-MPQ) was used to assess perceived quality of pain for all pulse forms. Results For the pin electrode, PT tended to decrease with increasing pulse area. Patch electrode PT tended to increase for increasing pulse area for non-rectangular 50 ms pulses, in contrast to 5 ms pulses, indicating accommodation of non-nociceptive fibers. Largest PT ratio was obtained for the 50 ms ED. SF-MPQ scores were higher for the pin- compared to the patch electrode. Pin electrode pain qualities were mainly described as stabbing and sharp. SF-MPQ scores did not differ between pulse forms. Conclusions Long duration ED pulses seem to activate nociceptive fibers better than regular, short duration pulses; most likely reflecting accommodation of non-nociceptive fibers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.750
Threshold uncertainty score0.407

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it