MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2742443204 · doi:10.2527/asasann.2017.010

010 Effect of different surgical incisions and anesthesia methods on wound healing in recently weaned beef calves

2017· article· en· W2742443204 on OpenAlexaff
Sònia Martí, Daniela M Meléndez, E. D. Janzen, Désirée Gellatly, C. E. M. Heuston, Edmond A. Pajor, K. S. Schwartzkopf-Genswein

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSurgical Sutures and Adhesives
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanUniversity of CalgaryAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCastrationMedicineLidocaineOrchiectomyScrotumAnesthesiaSurgeryHormone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A total of 48 recently weaned Angus crossbred bull calves (292 ± 19.1 kg BW) were used to evaluate the effect of types of anesthesia and surgical cuts on scrotal wound healing after castration. Calves were randomly assigned to a 2 × 2 factorial design assessing surgical castration incisions (cut made with Newberry knife [K] vs. bottom cut made with scalpel [B]) and method of anesthesia injected 20 min before castration (local anesthesia injected in the spermatic cord, around the neck of the scrotum and testicles [L; lidocaine HCl 2%] vs. epidural [E; xylazine]) to yield KL, KE, BL, and BE (12 calves/group). Wound healing was assessed in all calves over a 63-d period after castration using maximum scrotal area temperature (MST; °C) assessed via infrared thermography, scrotal circumference (SC; cm), visual evaluation of swelling (SW; 5-point scale in which 0 = no swelling and 5 = increased degree of swelling with presence of pus), and healing of the incision site (HI; 5-point scale in which 1 = incision open without scabbing and 5 = incision completely healed). Data was collected 8 h after castration on d 1, 2, 4, 7, 14, 17, and 21 after castration and weekly thereafter until the end of the study. Pain sensitivity was evaluated using a Von Frey anesthesiometer (g) following the same schedule. Data was analyzed using a mixed-effect model with incision, anesthesia, time, and their interactions as fixed effects and pen within animal as a random effect. An incision × time interaction (P < 0.05) was observed for MST, HI, and SW. The MST for B calves was greater (P < 0.05) on d 35, 56, and 63 compared with K calves. In addition, B calves tended to have greater HI scores (P = 0.06) on d 21, 28, and 35 than K calves, although no differences were observed at the end of the assessment period. In addition, from d 35 to 63, B calves had greater (P = 0.01) SW than K calves. Finally, calves administered local anesthesia tended to have greater scores for HI (P = 0.06) and lower SC (P < 0.001) than calves administered epidural anesthesia. No differences in pain sensitivity were observed between types of surgical incisions or methods of anesthesia. In summary, calves castrated using a Newberry knife and anesthetized using a local anesthetic healed faster and presented less swelling consistent with improved healing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.700
Threshold uncertainty score0.228

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.405
Teacher spread0.370 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal ScienceSame topicSurgical Sutures and AdhesivesFrench-language works237,207