EFFECT OF OVAPRIM HORMONE (SYNDEL LABORATORY, CANADA) ON SPAWNING OF KOI CARP AT FISH HATCHERY CHILYA THATTA, SINDH, PAKISTAN
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present study was conducted to observe the effect of intraperitonial injection of ovaprim hormone (syndel laboratory, Canada) on spawning of koi carp in cemented tanks at Fish Hatchery Chillya Thatta, Pakistan. The experiment was performed during 27th February 2013 to 25th March 2013 in which, 12 male & 06 female were selected from the brood ponds, average body weight of female was 536.7±6 g and male 579±8 g respectively, brood fish were injected with single dose 0.2 ml/kg for male and 0.5 ml/kg for female then released into spawning cemented tanks size (3x6x5 ft) with aquatic macrophytes (Hydrilla verticillata) for attachment and development due to adhesive nature of eggs. The ovulation rates, fertilization rate and hatching rate were 100%, 75.2%, and 83.3% respectively. The spawning response was good. Relative fecundity was estimated at 9930 eggs/kg. The result of this study clearly indicate the suitability of ovaprim for inducing breeding of Koi carp.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".