Rotational molding of self‐hybrid composites based on linear low‐density polyethylene and maple fibers
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, the morphological, physical, and mechanical properties of maple fiber self‐hybrid composites reinforced linear low‐density polyethylene (LLDPE) have been investigated for different concentration (10, 20, and 30%) and ratio (100/0, 75/25, 50/50, 25/75, and 0/100) of short (125–250 μm), medium (250–355 μm), and long (355–500 μm) fibers. Maple surface treatment with a coupling agent (maleated polyethylene, MAPE) was also investigated. The results show that surface treatment increased the tensile modulus and strength, and impact strength. Finally, the self‐hybrid composites gave better properties than single size fibers since a positive deviation from the linear law of mixture was observed, especially at 20% wt. For example, a 75/25 ratio of medium/short or long/short fibers produced a tensile modulus and tensile strength between 13% and 33% higher than composites formulated with a single fiber size. POLYM. COMPOS., 39:4094–4103, 2018. © 2017 Society of Plastics Engineers
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it