MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2742667829 · doi:10.2527/asasann.2017.502

502 Dissipation of antimicrobials and resistance genes in compost originating from cattle manure after direct oral administration or post-excretion fortification of antimicrobials

2017· article· en· W2742667829 on OpenAlexaff
Shuyuan Xu, Inoka Amarakoon, Rahat Zaheer, Srinivas Sura, Tim Reuter, Francis Zvomuya, Allan J. Cessna, Francis J. Larney, Tim A. McAllister

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of ManitobaAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAntimicrobialManureOral administrationCompostExcretionBiologyFortificationAnimal scienceMicrobiologyFood scienceAgronomyPharmacologyEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Our study compared the dissipation of antimicrobials and resistance genes (ARG) during composting of cattle manure fortified with antimicrobials versus manure from cattle administered the same antimicrobials in feed. Manure was collected from cattle fed diets containing (kg-1 dry feed): (1) 44 mg chlortetracycline (CTC), (2) a mixture of 44 mg each of chlortetracycline and sulfamethazine (CTCSMZ), (3) 11 mg tylosin (TYL) or (4) Control, no antimicrobials. Fortified treatments were generated by adding antimicrobials to control manure. All manures were composted for 30 d with a single mixing after 16 d. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) measured the concentration of 16S rDNA and genes associated with tetracycline (tet), erythromycin (erm), and sulfamethazine (sul) resistance. Over 95% of antimicrobials dissipated over 30 d of composting, but CTC and SMZ remained higher in fed than fortified treatments, with a reverse trend observed for tylosin. Copy numbers of 16S rDNA decreased (P < 0.05) over 30 d, but were not altered by the presence of antimcrobials. Levels of all ARG except tet(L) decreased by 0.1-1.6 log10 copies g dry matter-1 in the first compost cycle, but some genes [tet(B), tet(L), erm(F), and erm(X)] increased (P < 0.05) by 1.0-3.1 log10 copies g dry matter-1 in the second. This pattern aligned with the positive correlation of these ARG with residue concentrations in the first cycle and the negative correlation in the second. During 30 d of composting, levels of tet(M) and tet(W) in CTC, erm(A), erm(B) and erm(X) in TYL, and sul(1) in CTCSMZ remained higher (P < 0.05) in fed than fortified treatments. Our results suggest that dissipation of ARG during composting of manure fortified with antimicrobials differs from manure generated by cattle that are administered antimicrobials in feed and does not always align with the dissipation of antimicrobial residues.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal ScienceSame topicPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental ImpactsFrench-language works237,207