MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2742871709 · doi:10.1002/2016ja023171

GPS phase scintillation at high latitudes during the geomagnetic storm of 17–18 March 2015

2016· article· en· W2742871709 on OpenAlexafffund
Paul Prikryl, Reza Ghoddousi‐Fard, J. M. Weygand, A. Viljanen, Martin Connors, D. W. Danskin, P. T. Jayachandran, Knut Stanley Jacobsen, Y. L. Andalsvik, E. G. Thomas, J. M. Ruohoniemi, Tibor Durgonics, Kjellmar Oksavik, Yongliang Zhang, E. Spanswick, Márcio Aquino

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Space Physics · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Canadian institutionsAthabasca UniversityGeological Survey of CanadaNatural Resources CanadaUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilNatural Resources CanadaCanadian Space AgencyAugsburg UniversityNorges ForskningsrådNew Brunswick Innovation FoundationAthabasca UniversityAir Force Research LaboratoryNational Science Foundation
KeywordsScintillationGeomagnetic stormStormInterplanetary scintillationGlobal Positioning SystemEarth's magnetic fieldLatitudeIonospherePhase (matter)GeologyGeodesyEnvironmental scienceMeteorologyAtmospheric sciencesGeophysicsGeographyOceanographyPhysicsCoronal mass ejectionSolar windPlasmaMagnetic fieldNuclear physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The geomagnetic storm of 17–18 March 2015 was caused by the impacts of a coronal mass ejection and a high‐speed plasma stream from a coronal hole. The high‐latitude ionosphere dynamics is studied using arrays of ground‐based instruments including GPS receivers, HF radars, ionosondes, riometers, and magnetometers. The phase scintillation index is computed for signals sampled at a rate of up to 100 Hz by specialized GPS scintillation receivers supplemented by the phase scintillation proxy index obtained from geodetic‐quality GPS data sampled at 1 Hz. In the context of solar wind coupling to the magnetosphere‐ionosphere system, it is shown that GPS phase scintillation is primarily enhanced in the cusp, the tongue of ionization that is broken into patches drawn into the polar cap from the dayside storm‐enhanced plasma density, and in the auroral oval. In this paper we examine the relation between the scintillation and auroral electrojet currents observed by arrays of ground‐based magnetometers as well as energetic particle precipitation observed by the DMSP satellites. Equivalent ionospheric currents are obtained from ground magnetometer data using the spherical elementary currents systems technique that has been applied over the ground magnetometer networks in North America and North Europe. The GPS phase scintillation is mapped to the poleward side of strong westward electrojet and to the edge of the eastward electrojet region. Also, the scintillation was generally collocated with fluxes of energetic electron precipitation observed by DMSP satellites with the exception of a period of pulsating aurora when only very weak currents were observed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations78
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research Space PhysicsSame topicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamicsFrench-language works237,207