MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2742937094 · doi:10.2527/asasann.2017.676

676 Effects of grain source and starch concentration in dairy goat diet on ruminal fermentation, milk production, and inflammation

2017· article· en· W2742937094 on OpenAlexaff
Yizhao Shen, Wude Yang, L. Chen, Jinhao Xu, Hongrong Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicRuminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStarchLactoseAnimal scienceForageFood scienceTotal mixed rationChemistryRumenBiologyFermentationLactationAgronomyIce calving

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of grain (corn vs. wheat) and starch concentrations (low vs. high starch) on ruminal pH, milk production, and inflammatory response in dairy goats. Eight ruminally cannulated lactating goats (34 ± 3.1 kg of BW and 180 ± 8.2 d in milk) were used in a crossover design with a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement. Each period lasted for 27 d. During the first 10 d, goats were fed low-starch (LS) diets (d 8 to 10 for data collection); d 11 to 17, they were transitioned to high-starch (HS) diet; d 18 to 25, the goats were fed the HS diet; and data was collected d 25 to 27. Goats were fed a total mixed diet ad libitum twice daily. Diets were formulated as isonitrogenous (13.6%) and isoenergetic with forage-to-concentrate ratios of 60:40 and 35:65 for LS (24%) and HS (39% starch, DM basis) diets, respectively. Data were analyzed using PROC MIXED of SAS with model including diets as fixed effects and random effect of period and animal. Intake of DM (averaged 1.06 kg/d) was affected neither by grain source nor by starch concentration. However, goats fed the HS diet produced more (P < 0.05) milk (0.82 vs. 0.67 kg/d) and lactose (35.0 vs. 27.3 g/d) than goats fed the LS diet. Ruminal pH (averaged 6.15) did not differ but duration of pH < 5.6 was longer (P < 0.05) with wheat (232 min/d) than with corn (140 min/d). Ruminal pH was greater (6.16 vs. 5.87; P < 0.05) and duration of pH < 5.6 was shorter (33 vs. 339 min) for the HS diet than the LS diet. Concentration of ruminal lipopolysaccharide (LPS) was greater (P < 0.05) with wheat than with corn (35.5 vs. 22.1 ×103 EU/mL). Goats fed the HS diet also had greater (P < 0.05) LPS concentration in ruminal fluid (40.3 vs. 17.3 × 103 EU/mL) than goats fed the LS diet. Blood concentration of serum amyloid A (SAA; 75.7 vs. 62.7 μg/mL), haptoglobin (Hp; 96.3 vs. 91.6 μg/mL), and LPS binding protein (LBP; 2.3 vs. 1.6 μg/mL) were not affected by grain source, but goats fed the HS diet had more (P < 0.05) SAA (89.3 vs. 49.1), Hp (116.7 vs. 71.2), and LBP (2.4 vs. 1.5 μg/mL) than goats fed the LS diet. These results indicated that replacing corn with wheat in a lactating goat diet had little impact on ruminal pH and milk production. However, increasing starch concentration in goat diets is beneficial to improve milk production and immune activity by stimulating inflammatory response.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal ScienceSame topicRuminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207