Committed Hemopoietic Progenitors, Not Stem Cells, are the Principal Responders to Hox Gene Transduction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT As hemopoietic stem cells differentiate, their proliferative lifespan shortens by unknown mechanisms. Homeobox cluster (Hox) genes have been implicated by their enhancement of self-renewal when transduced into hemopoietic cells, but gene deletions have been inconclusive because of functional redundancy. Here we enforced HOXB4 expression in purified precursor stages, and compared responses of early stages expressing the endogenous genes with later stages that did not. Contrary to the prevalent view that transduced Hox genes enhance the self-renewal of hemopoietic stem cells, stem cells or their multipotent progeny expressing the endogenous genes showed little response. Instead, immortalization, extensive self-renewal and acquired reconstituting potential occurred in committed erythroid and myeloid progenitors where the endogenous genes were shutting down. The results change our understanding of the stages affected by exogenous HOX proteins and point to shutdown of the endogenous genes as a principal determinant of the shortened clonal lifespans of committed progenitor cells.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".