MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2743327291 · doi:10.1109/intmag.2017.8007616

Magnetic composite based magneto hydrodynamic pump

2017· article· en· W2743327291 on OpenAlexaff
M. A. Khan, Ilija R. Hristovski, Giovanni Marinaro, Jürgen Kosel

Bibliographic record

Venue2017 IEEE International Magnetics Conference (INTERMAG) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMicro and Nano Robotics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusKelowna General HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolyimideMaterials sciencePolydimethylsiloxaneElectrodeElectrical conductorAnodeOptoelectronicsComposite materialChemical engineeringNanotechnologyChemistryLayer (electronics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, an NdFeB isotropic magnetic powder - polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) composite is used as the magnetic flux source for the MHD pump. MHD pumps can only pump conductive fluids. While liquid metals such as mercury or gallium can be used as the conductive fluid, for most commercial applications saline fluids, such as blood, urine or sea water serve as the conductive medium. During the functioning of a saline fluid MHD pump, chlorine gas is evolved at the anode, which results in corrosion. Thus, cheaper metals such as copper and aluminum cannot be used as electrodes in such pumps. Electrodes made up of noble metals such as Gold and Platinum have been used, but they drive up the system cost and also need specialized fabrication processes for adequate sidewall coverage. Herein, CO <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sub> laser printing is used to convert the insulator polyimide (PI) to conductive graphene and this material is used as the electrode. A polyimide precursor is spun coated on a silicon wafer and thermally cured to form an 8 μm thick polyimide film. Selective printing of the CO <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sub> laser across the surface of the PI film with a speed of 92 mm/s and power of 3 W forms the laser induced graphene (LIG) electrodes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.762
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2017 IEEE International Magnetics Conference (INTERMAG)Same topicMicro and Nano RoboticsFrench-language works237,207