Experimental Validation of a Wideband Metasurface for Wide-Angle Scanning Leaky-Wave Antennas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Beam scanning arrays typically suffer from scan loss; an increasing degradation in gain as the beam is scanned from broadside toward the horizon in any given scan plane. Here, a metasurface is presented that reduces the effects of scan loss for a leaky-wave antenna (LWA). The metasurface is simple, being composed of an ultrathin sheet of subwavelength split-ring resonators. The leaky-wave structure is balanced, scanning from the forward region, through broadside, and into the backward region, and designed to scan in the magnetic plane. The metasurface is effectively invisible at broadside, where balanced LWAs are most sensitive to external loading. It is shown that the introduction of the metasurface results in increased directivity, and hence, gain, as the beam is scanned off broadside, having an increasing effect as the beam is scanned to the horizon. Simulations show that the metasurface improves the effective aperture distribution at higher scan angles, resulting in a more directive main beam, while having a negligible impact on cross-polarization gain. Experimental validation results show that the scan range of the antenna is increased from -39° ≤ θ ≤ +32° to -64° ≤ θ ≤ +70°, when loaded with the metasurface, demonstrating a flattened gain profile over a 135° range centered about broadside. Moreover, this scan range occurs over a frequency band spanning from 9 to 15.5 GHz, demonstrating a relative bandwidth of 53% for the metasurface.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".