Diaphragmatic Activity and Ventilation in Preterm Infants
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To determine the effects of sleep on diaphragmatic activity and ventilation we studied 10 preterm infants (birth weight 1,840 +/- 50 g, gestational age 33 +/- 0.6 weeks, and postnatal age 9.4 +/- 1.4 days). We measured surface and esophageal diaphragmatic electromyograms (EMGdi). Ventilation was measured using a nasal flowmeter and a flow-through system. Diaphragmatic activity was analyzed for total phasic activity, expiratory phasic activity, the expiratory to total phasic activity ratio, and the presence of 'tonic' activity. The latter was defined by the presence of electrical activity and the end of expiration. There was a decrease in the average total phasic activity (1.25 vs. 0.71 s, p = 0.001), expiratory phasic activity (0.67 vs. 0.21 s, p = 0.002), the expiratory to total phasic activity ratio (0.51:0.27 s, p = 0.001) and tonic activity (51 to 5%, p = 0.01) from quiet to REM sleep in the surface EMGdi. Similar changes were found in the esophageal EMGdi, except that tonic activity was rarely observed. In parallel with these changes in electrical activity of the diaphragm, minute ventilation and alveolar ventilation increased from quiet to REM sleep. This increase was primarily related to an increase in frequency with a negligible change in tidal volume. The increase in frequency was primarily due to shortening of inspiratory time. The findings that tonic activity recorded via surface electrodes decreased substantially from quiet to REM sleep and was not observed in the esophageal EMGdi suggests that this tonic activity may represent electrical activity of the postural muscles of the chest wall rather than the diaphragm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".