L’arrêt Health Services and Support de la Cour suprême du Canada : La constitutionnalisation du régime québécois des relations industrielles ?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’arret de 2007 Health Services and Support, de la Cour supreme du Canada reconnait le droit de negociation collective en tant que composante essentielle du droit constitutionnel a la liberte d’association tel que garanti par l’article 2d) de la Charte canadienne des droits et libertes. Il s’agit la d’un renversement complet de la jurisprudence anterieure de la Cour, laquelle n’accordait, en 1987, qu’une portee tres limitee a la liberte d’association, denuee de tout impact quant a la sphere du travail : les travailleurs et leurs organisations ne beneficiaient d’aucune garantie specifique au titre de la liberte constitutionnelle d’association, pas davantage par exemple qu’un club de lecture! Cette etude entend analyser, de maniere approfondie, la mise a l’ecart par la Cour supreme de sa lecture anterieure, tres formaliste, de l’article 2 d) de la Charte canadienne, et mettre en lumiere le recours, nouveau en ce domaine, a une approche a la fois instrumentale et axiologique de la liberte d’association. Les critiques formulees a l’encontre du jugement de la Cour supreme, en particulier au sein de la communaute des travaillistes au Canada anglais, sont egalement discutees. Enfin, notamment sur la base du droit international (les conventions de l’OIT en matiere de liberte syndicale), les auteurs etudient les implications previsibles de l’arret Health Services and Support au Quebec dans la perspective de la Charte des droits et libertes de la personne (article 3), y compris au regard du droit de greve.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.019 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.015 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".