MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2743814236 · doi:10.1109/isit.2017.8006770

Metric and topological entropy bounds on state estimation for stochastic non-linear systems

2017· article· en· W2743814236 on OpenAlexaff
Christoph Kawan, Serdar Yüksel

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeural dynamics and brain function
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsTopological entropyDynamical systems theoryApplied mathematicsLinear dynamical systemEntropy (arrow of time)Linear systemQuadratic equationMetric (unit)Noise (video)Stability (learning theory)State (computer science)Discrete mathematicsMathematical optimizationTopology (electrical circuits)Computer scienceAlgorithmCombinatoricsMathematical analysisArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper studies state estimation over noisy channels for stochastic non-linear systems. We consider three estimation objectives, a strong and a weak form of almost sure stability of the estimation error as well as quadratic stability in expectation. For all three objectives, we derive lower bounds on the smallest channel capacity Coabove which the objective can be achieved with an arbitrarily small error. Lower bounds are obtained via a dynamical systems (through a novel construction of a dynamical system), an information-theoretic and a random dynamical systems approach. The first two approaches show that for a large class of systems, such as additive noise systems, Co = ∞, i.e., the estimation objectives cannot be achieved via channels of finite capacity. The random dynamical systems approach is shown to be operationally non-adequate for the problem, since it yields finite lower bounds Co under mild assumptions. Finally, we prove that a memoryless noisy channel in general constitutes no obstruction to asymptotic almost sure state estimation with arbitrarily small errors, when there is no noise in the system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.041
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.041
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0030.008
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNeural dynamics and brain functionFrench-language works237,207