MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2744065001 · doi:10.2527/asasann.2017.227

227 Apparent and true digestibility of minerals in animal and vegetable ingredient based adult maintenance dog food

2017· article· en· W2744065001 on OpenAlexaff
Cara Cargo-Froom, Anna K. Shoveller, Ming Fan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone and Dental Protein Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIngredientLatin squareAnimal scienceAnimal feedFecesBioavailabilityBiologyFood scienceTrace MineralsRumen

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Minerals are essential in the diet of dogs throughout all life stages. There is a dearth of knowledge with regards to mineral digestibility in canines, and current knowledge focuses on the digestibility of supplemented minerals, not of endogenous mineral bioavailability of ingredients or formulated diets. The objective of this study was to determine the apparent digestibility and true digestibility of macro and trace minerals in canines fed either animal or vegetable based adult maintenance diets. We hypothesized that dogs fed the animal ingredient based diet would have higher mineral digestibility as compared to dogs fed the vegetable ingredient based diet. This study was designed as a 4 × 4 replicated Latin square. Eight purpose bred Beagles (2 intact males, 6 spayed females) of similar age (2.12 ± 0.35 years) were pair housed but fed individually based on individual energy requirements. Four diets (animal ingredient based diet, vegetable ingredient based diet, animal ingredient based diet diluted to 50% α-d-glucose, and vegetable ingredient based diet diluted to 50% with α-d-glucose) were fed to dogs with titanium dioxide included in the diet at 0.3% to enable calculation of digestibility. Kennel numbers were randomly assigned to each pair of dogs with all 8 dogs cycling through the 4 trial diets in random order. Each diet was fed for 10 d, and fecal samples were collected from d 6 to 10. Data were analyzed using a mixed model through SAS (version. 9.4, SAS Institute) with treatment, period, and kennel as a fixed effect and dog as the random effect. There was no difference in apparent digestibility of calcium between dogs fed vegetable vs. animal diets; however, dogs fed the vegetable based diet had greater true digestibility of calcium (P = 0.0143) as compared to dogs fed the animal based diet. The apparent and true digestibility phosphorus and iron were greater in dogs fed the vegetable based diets as compared to animal based diets (P < 0.001). There were no differences in apparent or true digestibility of potassium, copper, and zinc between dogs fed the animal and vegetable based diets (P > 0.05). These results suggest that apparent and true digestibility do not result in similar conclusions, and digestibility of endogenous minerals are similar or greater in dogs fed diets that are largely vegetable based.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal ScienceSame topicBone and Dental Protein StudiesFrench-language works237,207