MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2744207175 · doi:10.2527/asasann.2017.207

207 Genome-wide association study for beef fatty acid profile using haplotypes in Nellore cattle

2017· article· en· W2744207175 on OpenAlexaff
Fabieli Loise Braga Feitosa, Camila Urbano Braz, Marcos Vinícius Antunes de Lemos, Mariana Piatto Berton, R. M. D. O. Silva, Rafael Lara Tonussi, Elisa Peripolli, Bianca Ferreira Olivieri, Adrielle Matias Ferrinho, Lenise Freitas Mueller, Joyce de Jesus Mangini Furlan, A. S. Pereira, Lúcia Galvão de Albuquerque, Flávio S. Schenkel, Fernando Baldi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLinkage disequilibriumHanwooHaplotypeBiologyPolyunsaturated fatty acidSingle-nucleotide polymorphismFatty acidSNPAnimal scienceGenotypeGeneticsGeneBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of this study was to identify genomic regions associated with the total amount of saturated (SFA), monounsaturated (MUFA), and polyunsaturated (PUFA) fatty acids in the beef of Nellore cattle. The investigated dataset contained records from 963 Nellore bulls, about two years old, finished in feedlot (90 days). Meat samples of Longissimus dorsi muscle, between the 12th and 13th ribs of the left half-carcasses, were taken to measure the fatty acids (FAs). FAs were quantified by gas chromatography (GC-2010 Plus - Shimadzu AOC 20i autoinjector) using SP-2560 capillary column (100 m × 0.25 mm diameter with 0.02 mm thickness; Supelco, Bellefonte, PA). The animals were genotyped using the high-density SNP panel (BovineHD BeadChip assay 777k, Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA). Those SNP markers with minor allele frequency less than 0.05, call rate less than 90%, monomorphic, located on sex chromosomes, and those with unknown position were removed from the analysis. After genomic quality control, 470,007 SNPs and 868 animals were available for the analyses. Missing genotypes were imputed using FImpute software. Genotypes were phased to haplotypes using fastPHASE software and then haplotype blocks were defined based on linkage disequilibrium using HaploView software. Genome-wide association analyses were performed considering one haplotype at a time. The model included fixed effects of contemporary group (92 levels), haplotype (linear regression on number of copies), and age at slaughter as a linear covariate. Bonferroni correction was applied at 5% significance to adjust for multiple tests. A total of 83,883 haplotypes were included in the genome-wide association analyses. From those haplotypes, 292, 17, and 31 were significantly associated (P < 0.05) with SFA, MUFA, and PUFA, respectively. Most associations were found on BTA17, BTA3, BTA1, BTA8, BTA25, and BTA2. These significant regions harbor genes such as GALNT12, SLC6A7, CAMK2A, SYTL3, EPAS1, PRKCB, EPHA6, MPZL1, UHMK1, KIRREL, FYN, LTBP1, PRKCE, SIK2, TOM1L1, NF1, DNAJA3, SH2B2, AFAP1L2, and AGAP1. These genes are involved in lipid metabolism, reproductive hormone receptors, transport and use of fatty acids and cholesterol, phospholipid and membrane hydrolysis and biosynthesis, energy metabolism, and protein kinase synthesis. Thus, the identification of these associated haplotypes may contribute to further studies to validate these regions and prospect candidate genes that would be useful for breeding programs to improve the beef quality of Nellore cattle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal ScienceSame topicGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestockFrench-language works237,207