MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2744788896 · doi:10.1016/j.sjpain.2017.04.010

Expression of α <sub>1</sub> adrenergic receptor subtypes by afferent fibers that innervate rat masseter muscle

2017· article· en· W2744788896 on OpenAlexaff
Brian E. Cairns, Jiangui Liu, Hayes Wong

Bibliographic record

VenueScandinavian Journal of Pain · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPain Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrigeminal ganglionTRPV1Masseter muscleGanglionMedicineReceptorNociceptorNociceptionAdrenergic receptorEndocrinologyAnatomySensory systemOrofacial painInternal medicineNeuroscienceBiologyTransient receptor potential channel

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Aims In temporomandibular disorders sufferers, muscle pain is more severe in individuals who have undergone a traumatic stress. Why stress exacerbates masticatory muscle pain in these individuals is not known. One possibility is that under conditions of stress there is an interaction between the sympathetic and sensory nervous systems. This study investigated whether trigeminal ganglion neurons that innervate the masseter muscle express α 1 adrenergic receptor subtypes to identify whether a direct interaction between the sympathetic and sensory nervous systems is feasible. Methods Masseter muscle ganglion neurons were identified by injection of the fluorescent dye fast blue into the masseter muscle of 4 Sprague Dawley rats (2 male, 2 female). Trigeminal ganglion sections were stained for α 1a , α 1b or α 1d adrenergic receptors, as well as the transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TrpV1) receptor. Sections were examined with a Leica confocal microscope. The percent of masseter ganglion neurons expressing each receptor was calculated. Results Masseter muscle ganglion neurons expressed α 1a (29 ± 9%), α 1b (34 ± 4%) and α 1 d (19 ± 13%) adrenergic receptors. Expression of all three α 1 receptor subtypes was higher in female rats than in male rats. Expression of α 1b receptors was more commonly found on larger diameter masseter ganglion neurons. Overall 11±3% of masseter ganglion neurons expressed the TrpV1 receptor, which suggests they served a nociceptive function. The TrpV1 receptor was co-expressed by about ~10% of α 1a and α 1b receptor positive masseter ganglion neurons. Conclusions Afferent fibers that innervate the masseter muscle express all three α 1 adrenergic receptor subtypes. Agonists at the α 1 receptor have been previously shown to depolarize trigeminal ganglion neurons, which suggests that activation of these receptors on masseter muscle afferents would be excitatory. The expression of α 1 receptors by putative nociceptors that innervate the masseter may permit a direct interaction between the sensory and sympathetic system that contributes to pain in this muscle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score0.599

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScandinavian Journal of PainSame topicPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207