The Phosphinoboration of <i>N</i>‐Heterocycles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The addition of phosphinoboronate ester Ph2PBpin (pin=1,2‐O2C2Me4) (1) to a number of different N‐heterocycles has been investigated. Reaction of 1 with pyridine resulted in highly selective formation of the corresponding 1,4‐addition product, with addition of the electron‐deficient Bpin group to the pyridine nitrogen atom and the phosphido group to the para carbon atom. Conversely, reactions of para‐substituted pyridine derivatives occurred predominately to afford 1,2‐addition products while quinoline reacted to afford the 1,2‐adduct which ultimately isomerized to afford the corresponding 1,4‐addition product. Preliminary computational studies have been undertaken to explore possible pathways for these transformations including transfer of the PPh2− anion from [B(PPh2)2pin]− to the 4‐position of a borenium/boronium activated pyridine and concerted pathways for 1,2‐addition via intramolecular nucleophilic attack of PPh2 at C2 of a Ph2PBpin‐coordinated pyridine via a four‐centered transition state and intramolecular transfer of PPh2 to the 2‐position of a boron‐activated pyridine in a phosphido‐bridged dimer involving a six‐centered transition state.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".