MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2745157472 · doi:10.1017/jfm.2017.431

Initial development of a free-surface wall jet at moderate Reynolds number

2017· article· en· W2745157472 on OpenAlexaff
Roger E. Khayat

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Fluid Mechanics · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicParticle Dynamics in Fluid Flows
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMechanicsReynolds numberPhysicsLaminar flowFree surfaceJet (fluid)Inviscid flowOpen-channel flowTurbulenceInertiaClassical mechanicsMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The steady laminar flow of a moderately inertial wall jet is examined theoretically near the exit of a channel. The free-surface jet emerges asymmetrically from the channel as it adheres to an infinite (upper) wall subject to a pressure gradient. The problem is solved using the method of matched asymptotic expansions. The small parameter involved in the expansions is the inverse cubic power of the Reynolds number. The flow field is obtained by matching the inviscid rotational core flow separately with the free-surface and the two wall layers. The upstream influence is examined as well as the break in the symmetry between the two wall layers. The wall jet exhibits a contraction near the channel exit that is independent of inertia, and eventually expands for any Reynolds number. Unlike the flow of a wall jet emerging into the same ambient fluid, the free-surface jet experiences a limited weakening in shear stress along the infinite wall, suggesting the possibility of separation for a jet with relatively low inertia. Significant shearing and elongation ensue at the exit, accompanied by flattening of the velocity profile near the upper wall.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.564
Threshold uncertainty score0.789

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Fluid MechanicsSame topicParticle Dynamics in Fluid FlowsFrench-language works237,207