Initial development of a free-surface wall jet at moderate Reynolds number
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The steady laminar flow of a moderately inertial wall jet is examined theoretically near the exit of a channel. The free-surface jet emerges asymmetrically from the channel as it adheres to an infinite (upper) wall subject to a pressure gradient. The problem is solved using the method of matched asymptotic expansions. The small parameter involved in the expansions is the inverse cubic power of the Reynolds number. The flow field is obtained by matching the inviscid rotational core flow separately with the free-surface and the two wall layers. The upstream influence is examined as well as the break in the symmetry between the two wall layers. The wall jet exhibits a contraction near the channel exit that is independent of inertia, and eventually expands for any Reynolds number. Unlike the flow of a wall jet emerging into the same ambient fluid, the free-surface jet experiences a limited weakening in shear stress along the infinite wall, suggesting the possibility of separation for a jet with relatively low inertia. Significant shearing and elongation ensue at the exit, accompanied by flattening of the velocity profile near the upper wall.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".