MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2745230667 · doi:10.1002/2017jb014191

Velocity models and hypocenter relocations for the Charlevoix Seismic Zone

2017· article· en· W2745230667 on OpenAlexaffabout
C. A. Powell, Maurice Lamontagne

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topicearthquake and tectonic studies
Canadian institutionsGeological Survey of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyHypocenterSeismologyRiftImpact structureDevonianFault (geology)BasementShoreTectonicsPaleontologyInduced seismicity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Three‐dimensional P and S wave velocity (Vp and Vs) models and hypocenter relocations are determined for the Charlevoix Seismic Zone (CSZ) using local arrival time tomography. The CSZ is located along the St. Lawrence River about 100 km downstream from Quebec City, Canada, and is one of the most active seismic zones in eastern North America. Earthquakes occur in Grenvillian basement rocks affected by Iapetan Ocean rifting and a large Devonian meteor impact. Low Vp and Vs are associated with the impact structure to a depth of 12 km. Relocated hypocenters form a semicircle delineating the eastern margin of the impact structure. Northeast of the impact, hypocenters cluster into two groups separated by a region of high Vp and Vs velocity. Hypocenters within each group align along planar surfaces, suggesting the presence of distinct seismogenic faults. The planes trend NE, in the same direction as the Iapetan rift faults, and dip to the SE. One plane is located beneath the north shore of the St. Lawrence River and extends to a depth of at least 30 km. Two other planes with shallower dips are located beneath the river and extend to depths of 12 and 15 km. All three planes are disrupted within the impact zone but can be followed, suggesting partial preservation of rift‐parallel fault fabric.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.863
Threshold uncertainty score0.272

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.104
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research Solid EarthSame topicearthquake and tectonic studiesFrench-language works237,207