MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2745275680 · doi:10.36108/ijss/0102.80.0260

National Health Accounts of Nigeria: Results from Second Round of Estimation

2010· article· en· W2745275680 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Akanni Olayinka Lawanson, Olanrewaju Olaniyan, Adedoyin Soyibo

Bibliographic record

VenueIBADAN JOURNAL OF THE SOCIAL SCIENCES · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicGlobal Health Care Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEstimationPoolingGovernment (linguistics)Health spendingQuarter (Canadian coin)Stewardship (theology)Health careBusinessPublic healthFinanceEconomic growthPublic economicsActuarial scienceHealth insuranceEconomicsMedicinePolitical scienceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

National Health Accounts (NHA) tracks the flows of health spending from financial sources to end users. This paper uses the framework to capture the general health expend it lire and updates the earlier NHA for Nigeria by providing estimates for 2003 2005. The estimates were prepared in line with the WHO’s guide to the NHA estimation. Our estimates reveal that households are the major source of health funds in Nigeria. Government funding accounts for a quarter of the health funds and but the main incidence still lies with households. These funds were spent about equally in private and public health facilities. Although resource pooling is not widespread health insurance show promise as a significant potential option in health care financing. Given health as a public good, the implication is that there is need for government focus on the responsibility to lessening the burden of health expenditure 011 poor households if its stewardship role is not to be called to question.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.715
Threshold uncertainty score0.842

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.497
Teacher spread0.412 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIBADAN JOURNAL OF THE SOCIAL SCIENCESSame topicGlobal Health Care IssuesFrench-language works237,207