MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2745336469 · doi:10.1139/cjps-2016-0208

Characterization of two Winter wheat varieties' responses to freezing in a frigid region of China

2017· article· en· W2745336469 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yinglu Sun, liangshuang fu, Lu Chen, Xiaonan Wang, Yongchao Song, Zhuofu Li

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plant Science · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Stress Responses and Tolerance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOsmolyteBetaineCultivarMalondialdehydeWinter wheatHorticultureChemistryAbiotic componentFood scienceAgronomyBiologyBotanyOxidative stressBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cold stress is one of the main abiotic stresses faced by winter wheat, which results in significant yield loss, especially in the harsh winter of the Heilongjiang province. Glycine betaine (GB), an important osmolyte in higher plants, helps in the stabilization of the plasma membrane and its protection from cold stress. In the present study, two winter wheat varieties that differ in cold resistance, Dongnongdongmai1 (DM1) and Jimai22 (J22), were planted under natural conditions and used for analyzing relative electrical conductivity, malondialdehyde (MDA) content, betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase (BADH) activity, expression of BADH, and the content of GB. The cold-resistant variety, DM1, showed a greater increase in BADH activity and GB content and decrease in MDA content than J22 under freezing conditions. GB was observed to have an obvious role in inhibiting the MDA content. This was reflected by the expression of BADH and enhanced tolerance to cold stress upon GB accumulation, which helped membrane stabilization. The results of the present study confirmed the role of GB in conferring cold resistance in the DM1 winter cultivar and could benefit other studies aimed at improving the tolerance of other wheat cultivars and other crops.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Plant ScienceSame topicPlant Stress Responses and ToleranceFrench-language works237,207