Nocturnal Relative Humidity Maxima above the Boundary Layer in the U.S. Midwest: A Diagnostic for the Mountain–Plains Solenoidal Circulation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Measurements from the Aircraft Communications, Addressing, and Reporting System (ACARS) dataset between 2005 and 2014 are used to construct diurnal vertical cross sections of relative humidity in the lower troposphere at six airports in the U.S. Midwest. In summer, relative humidity maxima occur between 2 and 3 km during the overnight hours of 0300–0900 local solar time (LST). These maxima coincide with negative anomalies in temperature and positive anomalies in specific humidity. Vertical winds from the Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications, version 2 (MERRA-2), reanalysis dataset show that the height and diurnal timing of these positive relative humidity anomalies are consistent with the regional diurnal pattern of vertical motion. During the day, there is rising motion over the Rocky Mountains and subsidence over the Midwest, while conversely at night, there is sinking motion over the mountains and rising motion over the Midwest. The nocturnal relative humidity maxima over the Midwest are the strongest direct observational evidence to date of this mountain–plains solenoidal circulation, and provide a useful diagnostic for testing the strength of this circulation in climate and reanalysis models. There is significant interannual variability in the strength of the nocturnal relative humidity maxima. In 2011, the relative humidity maxima are very pronounced. In 2014, however, they are almost nonexistent. Finally, the relative humidity maxima are discussed in relation to the low-level jet (LLJ). The LLJ appears to be too low to directly contribute to the nocturnal relative humidity maxima.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".