MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Mineralogy and Surface Chemistry of Alberta Oil Sands: Relevance to Nonaqueous Solvent Bitumen Extraction

2017· article· en· W2745559818 on OpenAlexaffabout
Marek Osacký, Mirjavad Geramian, Peter Uhlík, Mária Čaplovičová, Zuzana Danková, Helena Pálková, Martina Vítková, Milota Kováčová, Douglas G. Ivey, Qi Liu, Thomas H. Etsell

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy & Fuels · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersEuropean Regional Development FundVedecká Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR a SAVMinisterstvo školstva, vedy, výskumu a športu Slovenskej republiky
KeywordsIlliteOil sandsKaoliniteClay mineralsQuartzMineralogyExtraction (chemistry)AsphaltGeologyChemistryTolueneMineralMaterials scienceChromatographyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The mineralogy, chemistry, surface properties, and pore structure characteristics of the four different petrologic types of Alberta oil sands were determined in order to better understand their impact on nonaqueous solvent bitumen extraction. Quartz, clay minerals, and carbonates were the main mineral constituents of the studied samples. With increasing weight percentage of clay minerals, the solvent bitumen extraction (by the Dean–Stark procedure using toluene) decreased. Fine grained illite and illite-smectite had more detrimental effect on solvent bitumen extraction than coarse grained kaolinite. The pore structure data revealed that the extractability of bitumen from the oil sands depends on accessibility, more specifically on the size of bitumen-filled pores, by the solvent. The relative abundance and size of pores in the oil sands were controlled by mineral composition and particle size. Fine size fractions were typically enriched in kaolinite and 2:1 clay minerals (illite and illite-smectite) and contained small pores, with diameters of ∼100 and ∼10 nm, respectively. Coarse size fractions were usually rich in quartz and contained large pores with diameters greater than 200 nm. The efficiency of nonaqueous bitumen extraction was significantly higher for coarse grained, quartz-rich oil sands in which the organic matter was distributed mainly at a scale of greater than 200 nm compared with fine grained, clay-rich oil sands where organic matter occurred as meso-macropore filling material within clay mineral aggregates. Overall, the finest (<0.2 μm) fraction of oil sands composed mainly of illite and illite-smectite had the most detrimental effect on solvent bitumen extraction. This was related to the contrasting properties of the finest fraction (mainly high specific surface area, high cation exchange capacity, and the presence of small-sized pores) compared with the other studied fractions of oil sands.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.782
Threshold uncertainty score0.434

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy & FuelsSame topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysisFrench-language works237,207