MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Patient-reported quality of life (QOL) following CTL019 in pediatric and young adult patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (r/r) b-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL).

2017· article· en· W2745636200 on OpenAlexaff
Andrew C. Dietz, Stephan A. Grupp, Theodore W. Laetsch, Heather E. Stefanski, Gary Douglas Myers, Henrique Bittencourt, Jochen Buechner, Eneida R. Nemecek, Paul L. Martin, Hidefumi Hiramatsu, Françoise Méchinaud, Gregory A. Yanik, Barbara De Moerloose, Patricia A. Wood, Lawrence Rasouliyan, Yiyun Zhang, Simu K. Thomas, Sweta Shah, Andrew C. Harris

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCAR-T cell therapy research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAdverse effectQuality of life (healthcare)Internal medicineInterim analysisTransplantationClinical trialRefractory (planetary science)SurgeryOncology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

10523 Background: The global ELIANA trial (NCT02435849) evaluates the efficacy and safety of CTL019, a single infusion of genetically modified autologous chimeric antigen receptor–expressing T cells targeting CD19+ cells in pediatric and young adult r/r B-ALL pts. Analyses show a complete response rate of 82% with or without complete blood count recovery ≤ 3 months. A serious adverse event rate of 71% was observed in ≤ 8 weeks of infusion, decreasing to 17% at > 8 weeks (Grupp S, et al. Blood. 2016;128(22) [abstract 221].). This analysis further evaluates the clinical benefit of CTL019. QOL was assessed before and after CTL019 infusion. Methods: Infused pts were 3-23 y/o with CD19+ B-ALL who were chemo refractory, relapsed after allogeneic stem cell transplant (SCT), or otherwise ineligible for SCT. Pts ≥ 8 y completed the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) and EuroQol EQ-5D at baseline and following CTL019 infusion. Minimal clinically important differences are estimated to be 4.4 and 7 to 10 for PedsQL and EQ-5D, respectively. Results: 62 of 81 enrolled pts were infused; 56% had relapsed after SCT with median of 3 prior therapies. At interim analysis, 50 pts were treated ≥ 3 months prior to data cutoff and eligible for primary efficacy analysis. A total of 39 pts were ≥ 8 y. Mean PedsQL total and EQ-5D VAS scores, respectively, were 58.4 and 69.4 at baseline. Mean changes from baseline for the PedsQL total and EQ VAS scores, respectively, were 13.9 and 13.7 at month 3 and 12.8 and 10.9 at month 6, supporting clinically meaningful improvements in QOL. Similar trends were observed with each PedsQL subscale. With EQ-5D, the proportions of pts reporting problems with mobility, self-care, usual activities, anxiety/depression, or pain/discomfort were notably decreased at months 3 and 6 compared with baseline. Conclusions: Clinically meaningful improvements in QOL were observed at 3 and 6 months after CTL019 therapy in pediatric and young adult r/r B-ALL pts, including fewer problems in each EQ-5D domain. These results suggest improved QOL after this one-time immunocellular therapy beyond the period of acute toxicities. Clinical trial information: NCT02435849.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.430
Teacher spread0.353 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicCAR-T cell therapy research→French-language works237,207→