MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2745939357 · doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1263

Demonstration Results of Enzyme-Accelerated CO2 Capture

2017· article· en· W2745939357 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Louis Fradette, Sylvain Lefèbvre, Jonathan Carley

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy Procedia · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCarbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsData scrubbingReuseWaste managementProcess engineeringTonneEnvironmental scienceSolventEngineeringChemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CO 2 Solutions Inc. of Québec, Canada has commercialized a proprietary low-cost, enzyme accelerated solvent technology for the capture of carbon dioxide and its beneficial reuse. Enzyme catalyzed aqueous salt solutions can be deployed with a variety of gas scrubbing equipment configurations to replace costly and environmentally challenged amines solvents as an efficient solution for post-combustion CO 2 capture. The presentation will discuss the results of its 10 tonne-CO 2 /day demonstration carried out in the summer and fall of 2015 in Salaberry-de-Valleyfield (“Valleyfield), near Montreal, Canada. The Valleyfield project was the largest-ever scale test of an enzyme-based CO 2 capture process and used an industrially robust form of carbonic anhydrase enzyme developed by CO 2 Solutions to capture CO 2 from a natural gas fired boiler. The demonstration operated successfully for a total of more than 2,500 hours and saw stable performance of the enzyme catalyst, stable solvent performance with negligible degradation, no wastes generated, and highly pure CO 2 produced suitable for a broad range of reuse applications. In addition, the use of low-grade, nil-value heat for solvent regeneration at low temperature was accomplished, demonstrating this innovative method of operating cost savings. The presentation will include performance aspects of the demonstration and associated techno-economics of the technology for application to electricity and steam generation. An update on the technology's commercial implementation will also be provided.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy ProcediaSame topicCarbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207