MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2745963959 · doi:10.1002/lt.24849

Influence of outflow‐obstructed liver volume and venous communication development: A three‐dimensional volume study in living donors

2017· article· en· W2745963959 on OpenAlexaff
Yoshikuni Kawaguchi, Kiyoshi Hasegawa, Naoki Okura, Harufumi Maki, Nobuhisa Akamatsu, Junichi Kaneko, Junichi Arita, Yoshihiro Sakamoto, Kuni Ohtomo, Norihiro Kokudo

Bibliographic record

VenueLiver Transplantation · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOrgan Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsPancreas Centre (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMuscle hypertrophyOutflowLiver transplantationInternal medicineVeinCardiologySurgeryUrologyTransplantation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Living donor liver transplantation using the left liver graft with the middle hepatic vein (MHV) is a well‐established procedure. Following such procedures, outflow obstruction occurs in remnant livers. However, the effects of the outflow‐obstructed liver volume (LV Out‐Ob ), with or without venous communication development, remain unclear. The aim of the study is to investigate effects of outflow‐obstructed regions by focusing on short‐term outcomes and remnant liver hypertrophy in left liver procurement donors. Of 532 donors, we collected data from 119 undergoing left liver procurement with the MHV. Postoperative hepatic parameters, venous communication development, and liver hypertrophy were evaluated in 2 donor groups based on LV Out‐Ob . The left liver was procured with the MHV in 119 donors, who formed 2 more groups based on the median LV Out‐Ob : large‐outflow‐obstruction group (n = 60; LV Out‐Ob ≥ 263 mL) and small‐outflow‐obstruction (n = 59; LV Out‐Ob < 263 mL) group. Postoperative liver function parameters were significantly impaired in the large‐outflow‐obstruction group compared with the small‐outflow‐obstruction group. Postoperative venous communication developed in 52 (66.7%) of 78 donors analyzed. Hypertrophy ratios in remnant right livers and right paramedian sectors were significantly higher in the small‐outflow‐obstruction group than in the large‐outflow‐obstruction group ( P = 0.01 and P = 0.02, respectively). The liver hypertrophy ratio of outflow‐obstructed regions was better, especially in small regions developing venous communication ( P = 0.001). The postoperative morbidity rate did not differ significantly ( P = 0.66). In conclusion, the procurement of the left liver graft with the MHV was safely performed with minimal morbidity by assessing the donor remnant right liver volume with and without outflow obstruction. Attention should be paid that postoperative hepatic parameters and remnant liver hypertrophy were impaired in the remnant livers with large outflow–obstructed regions compared with those with small outflow–obstructed regions. Liver Transplantation 23 1531–1540 2017 AASLD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.614

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLiver TransplantationSame topicOrgan Transplantation Techniques and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207