MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W274631342

Mark Twain's Mysterious Scoresheet: Personal Reviews, Op-Ed Pieces, and Polemics from outside the Purview of the Umpires

2011· article· en· W274631342 on OpenAlex
Darryl Brock

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueNine · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAmerican Sports and Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLeagueBiographyBluesContext (archaeology)Art historyHistoryClubPerformance artCONTESTArtClassicsPhilosophyMedicineTheology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Samuel Langhorne Clemens, widely known as Mark Twain, died at seventy-five in 1910. Several decades later, Twain's secretary from the author's final years produced a folded page of penciled notations, to which she attached this statement: Along in 1905 Mr. Clemens handed this baseball scoring to me saying, 'Someday we'll talk about that Hartford game for the Autobiography.' (1) If such a conversation occurred, seemingly it went no further, for baseball is not mentioned in Mark Twain's autobiography. Over the years, the scoresheet has been almost completely ignored, and which game Twain had in mind or why the contest was noteworthy remains unknown. Beyond such basics, Twain's enigmatic notations give rise to a number of secondary puzzlers, the whole of it constituting a mystery which defies easy resolution. THE BASEBALL CONTEXT Though bearing no date, the paper itself offers clues: entwined red letters, SLC, together with the Hartford address, identify it as stationery used by Twain in the 1870s. (2) Not coincidentally, it was during that decade, from 1874 through 1876, that Hartford enjoyed the presence of the only big-league professional baseball club in its history.(3) Twain's penciled scrawl atop the logoed sheet, Stockings vs Blue, clearly references the Hartford Dark Blues, along with a formidable rival, Boston's red-legged perennial champions. During the Dark Blues' three seasons in Hartford, they hosted Boston a total of sixteen times. (4) Twain, who enjoyed a number of recreational pursuits in these years, typically attended games with the Reverend Joseph Twichell, who had married into the Clemens family and would be the author's lifelong friend. As Twain once remarked, Preachers are always pleasant company when they are off duty. Twichell, who played center field on a local amateur nine, made the perfect ballpark companion.(5) A close inspection of David H. Fears's monumental Mark Twain Day by Day serves to eliminate those dates when the pair likely could not have attended a Hartford-Boston match. (6) Subtracting those dates when Twain was in retreat at his in-laws' Elmira farm, visiting New York City, traveling abroad, or otherwise absent from Hartford, we are left with seven candidates: [FIGURE 1 OMITTED] 1874: October 6, October 23 1875: May 18, September 25, October 19 1876: May 1, May 19 Given the small number, it would seem a simple process to identify the contest in question, especially since Twain cites specific players and game events: * Gone up on a to H * Scored an earned run on a safe hit & hits wh put out the other batsman after he had stolen second. * 2-base hits & singles * W giving A a life by an error * G. muffing a from C which gave 2 runs * home being made agst W who pitched in the 9th inning. * to Pike on the fly. * Gone up on a to H * got a baser Assuming that capital letters stand for players' surnames, we find our search further aided by a fortuitous division on the Hartford and Boston rosters: all Ws happen to be Red Stockings; all As and Cs and Hs are Dark Blues. Accordingly, the ball at the top of the bulleted list necessarily was captured by Hastings, Harbidge, or Higham. In the fourth item, Addy or Allison got on base by means of an error committed by one of the Boston Ws; and in the next G mishandled a from Carey or Cummings, resulting in two runs scored against W pitching in the ninth inning. The letter G is not found on the rosters, but Twain might have used it to differentiate between two Red Stocking siblings. Reporters sometimes referred to George Wright, Boston's star shortstop, simply as George to distinguish him from his older brother Harry, the team's manager and change pitcher. Out to Pike on the fly almost certainly refers to Lipman Pike, generally regarded as the first Jewish professional player in the country. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.467
Threshold uncertainty score0.986

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it