MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2746348580

Don’t Miss Out on Research Opportunities

2017· article· en· W2746348580 on OpenAlex
Sarah A. Gagliano Taliun

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Student Science and Technology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnthusiasmCuriosityPassionPsychologyPedagogyConstructiveMedical educationMedicineSocial psychologyComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Student Science and Technology Online Research Co-op Program provides mentors, including myself, an opportunity to further develop their mentoring skills, and to play a role in educating the next generation of scientists. This semester, I am mentoring my third student through the Co-op Program in the area of genetics and neuroscience. I have always loved teaching, especially teaching genetics, and have been thrilled to pass on my enthusiasm and knowledge to students by guiding them through their research projects. Mentors play a critical role. They can pass on their passion about the subject, promote curiosity and questioning, and offer the right balance between constructive criticism on projects, and words of encouragement. I am fortunate to have had (and continue to have) superb mentors throughout my science education and career who fit the above criteria, and I strive to be like them as a mentor in the Co-op Program. I cannot emphasize enough the importance of early exposure to research opportunities. My own educational research experiences had a profound effect on me choosing to pursue a career in research. For example, in my last year of undergraduate studies, I received offers to pursue three diverse pathways: optometry school, a Masters of Teaching Program, and a research-based graduate program. I had several early exposure  to research; one of which, was an independent research project in Grade 12 Biology on the relationship between height and stride length in human adults compared to measurements from the fossil record of Homo sapiens’ predecessors. Another research experience was during my fourth-year of undergraduate studies when I participated in an undergraduate Research Opportunity Program. I investigated parent- of-origin expression bias, which assesses whether a gene inherited from one parent is expressed more often than the gene inherited from the other parent, in a set of genes related to a rare neurodevelopmental disorder. It was these positive experiences with scientific research that led me to a research-based graduate program and career in statistical genetic research as a post-doctoral research fellow at the University of Michigan. The articles in this issue demonstrate the skills, knowledge and passion gained by these Co-op students in specialized and interdisciplinary fields of research. The Student Science and Technology Online Research Co-op Program provides students with a wonderful opportunity to get exposed to the research and publication process, gain scientific literacy, as each field of science has its vocabulary to be mastered, and also hopefully instill a desire for lifelong learning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.414
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.140
GPT teacher head0.431
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it