MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2746492294 · doi:10.1177/0020702017723563

Donald Creighton: A Life in History, by Donald Wright

2017· article· en· W2746492294 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Donald B. Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal Canada s Journal of Global Policy Analysis · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWrightBiographyMultitudeNarrativeHistoryPoliticsClassicsNationalismArt historySociologyLiteratureLawArtPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Donald B. Smith (), Professor Emeritus of History, University of CalgaryDonald Wright, associate professor in the Department of Political Science at the University of New Brunswick, has written an impressive biography of Donald Creighton, known in the mid-twentieth century as English Canada's greatest historian (9, 198, 329). The author's writing style is commendable, the book is well organized, and the extensive research supporting the text is exceptional. Well-chosen illustrations and a complete index add greatly to this well-constructed biography. The author's introduction eloquently sets the stage for the 13 chapters that follow. Wright's Donald Creighton: A Life in History makes a significant and important contribution to our understanding of English Canadian historical writing in the twentieth century. It explains well Creighton's British-Canadian nationalism and, in his later years, his strident anti-Americanism.The biography owes much of its success to the author's fine research in both primary and secondary sources, and his interviews. The author has taken a multitude of facts and transformed them into a vivid and informative narrative. Donald Creighton (1902-1979) advanced quickly in his career as a history professor at the University of Toronto, where he taught from 1927 to his retirement in 1971. With the publication of The Commercial Empire of the St. Lawrence in 1937, he gained the reputation as his generation's leading Canadian historian. emphasis on the importance of the St. Lawrence River in opening up the interior of the continent provided the narrative thread for the book. two-volume study of John A. Macdonald, The Young Politician (1952) and The Old Chieftain (1955), which both won the Governor General's Award for non-fiction in their respective years of publication, solidified his reputation. He had a genius for narrative history (321).Don Wright hides nothing in his biography. The eminent professor was a difficult person to get along with. In the author's words: His fuse was famously short and he could explode without warning, meaning his friends, and colleagues learned to walk on eggshells in his presence (9). work drive consumed him, weakening him both physically and emotionally. Fortunately for him, Luella, his devoted wife, never wavered in her support. He did have several close male friends, three among them being John Gray, his editor at Macmillan; Robert Finch, a University of Toronto French professor and poet; and Harold Innis, the celebrated University of Toronto political economist, whose biography, Harold Adams Innis: Portrait of a Scholar Creighton wrote in 1957. To others, however, Creighton often appeared arrogant. He had limited interpersonal skills, and as Chair of the History Department at the University of Toronto from 1955 to 1959, he was a disaster (chapter 9). He had no close friends in the History Department (220).Donald Creighton was a British-Canadian historian, one who showed little interest in French Canada. He lived for several months in France in the late 1920s. We learn that although he loved reading French novels (9), he apparently read little on Canadian history in French-language sources (192). No evidence is provided that Donald Creighton ever spoke French in Canada. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.892
Threshold uncertainty score0.215

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0070.006
Scholarly communication0.0070.006
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal Canada s Journal of Global Policy AnalysisSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207