MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

GEOMECHANICAL AND ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT OF THE WIDTH OF VANDALISM PROTECTION ARRANGEMENT AT RE-USE OF THE DEVELOPMENT WORKINGS IN THE COAL MINES

2017· article· en· W2747200442 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOccupational Safety in Industry · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering and Environmental Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoalMining engineeringForensic engineeringCoal miningGeologyPetroleum engineeringEngineeringWaste management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The geomechanical task is set up and solved, which is related to the assessment of allowable protection arrangement width (of the pillar) in the lava at the development of a horizontally embedded coal seam taking into account the economic feasibility of the haulage roadway re-use. Mining-geological and mining and technical conditions of coal reserves mining in the Western Donbass at Samarskaya mine are considered, which is accepted as the specific object of study. The solution of the set task is carried out in a complex way on the basis of generalization of the field studies and numerical experiment on digital models using RS2 software package of the Canadian company Rocscience. In the numerical experiment the flat heavy layered medium is studied weakened by the working of the complicated form. From the methodological point of view, a step-by-step solution simulating the movement of the lava face in the process of coal seam mining is carried out. Dependences of the residual section area of the re-used working on the width and structural compliance of the protection arrangement are obtained. It is proved that in the considered geological-mining and mining and technical conditions the economically and geomechanically reasonable width of the coal pillar shall be 3 m, and the structure of the tie-bar — 4 m. The structures from Tekhard were not investigated due to high cost of hardening mixtures. It is established that the technological gap between the protection arrangement and the roof rocks negatively effects the stability of the re-used working critically reducing the area of its residual section, and shall be reduced to a minimum size. The recommendations formed as a result of the carried out studies are implemented at the Samarskaya mine with the positive economic effect.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.123
Threshold uncertainty score0.181

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it