GEOMECHANICAL AND ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT OF THE WIDTH OF VANDALISM PROTECTION ARRANGEMENT AT RE-USE OF THE DEVELOPMENT WORKINGS IN THE COAL MINES
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The geomechanical task is set up and solved, which is related to the assessment of allowable protection arrangement width (of the pillar) in the lava at the development of a horizontally embedded coal seam taking into account the economic feasibility of the haulage roadway re-use. Mining-geological and mining and technical conditions of coal reserves mining in the Western Donbass at Samarskaya mine are considered, which is accepted as the specific object of study. The solution of the set task is carried out in a complex way on the basis of generalization of the field studies and numerical experiment on digital models using RS2 software package of the Canadian company Rocscience. In the numerical experiment the flat heavy layered medium is studied weakened by the working of the complicated form. From the methodological point of view, a step-by-step solution simulating the movement of the lava face in the process of coal seam mining is carried out. Dependences of the residual section area of the re-used working on the width and structural compliance of the protection arrangement are obtained. It is proved that in the considered geological-mining and mining and technical conditions the economically and geomechanically reasonable width of the coal pillar shall be 3 m, and the structure of the tie-bar — 4 m. The structures from Tekhard were not investigated due to high cost of hardening mixtures. It is established that the technological gap between the protection arrangement and the roof rocks negatively effects the stability of the re-used working critically reducing the area of its residual section, and shall be reduced to a minimum size. The recommendations formed as a result of the carried out studies are implemented at the Samarskaya mine with the positive economic effect.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".