Bibliographic record
Abstract
EnglishWhen there was one indivisible Imperial Crown, the law concerning royal succession, abdication, and regency remained uniform throughout the Empire and was controlled by the Parliament of the United Kingdom. When that Crown became divisible, problems arose as to whether existing British laws concerning the Crown had been incorporated into the law of each self-governing Dominion and how such laws could be amended in the future with respect to each separate Crown. The independence of the Realms and the termination of the power of the Westminster Parliament to legislate for the Realms has exacerbated the uncertainty as to how such laws apply and may be amended. This article addresses the application of the law concerning royal succession, abdication, and regency in the Realms of Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, focusing in particular on the recent changes to the rules of succession to the throne and the litigation that it prompted in Canada. It also considers what action would need to be taken if a regency was required to accommodate an incapacitated monarch. francaisLorsqu’il y avait une Couronne imperiale indivisible, la loi concernant la succession royale, l’abdication et la regence demeura identique partout dans l’Empire et elle fut controlee par le Parlement du Royaume-Uni. Lorsque cette Couronne devint divisible, des problemes se poserent a savoir si les lois britanniques existantes se rapportant a la Couronne avaient ete integrees dans le droit de chaque dominion autonome et comment de telles lois, dans le cas de chaque Couronne distincte, pourraient etre modifi ees a l’avenir. L’independance des royaumes et la fin de la competence legislative du Parlement de Westminster quant aux royaumes aggrava l’incertitude a savoir comment de telles lois s’appliquent et peuvent etre modifiees. Dans cet article, l’auteure aborde l’application de la loi concernant la succession royale, l’abdication et la regence dans les royaumes du Canada, de l’Australie et de la Nouvelle-Zelande, en accordant notamment la priorite aux modifications recentes aux regles de succession au trone et aux litiges qu’elles provoquerent au Canada. L’auteure examine egalement les mesures qui seraient necessaires dans le cas ou une regence fut requise afin d’accommoder un monarque incapable
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".