O Estado Quebequense Diante dos Desafios da Diversidade Etnocultural
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O presente texto retraça, à luz do contexto internacional, a trajetória quebequense em matéria de integração e de gestão da diversidade. Destacando as diferentes tendências que marcaram a evolução das políticas e iniciativas do Estado do Quebec desde meados dos anos 1960, Alain-G. Gagnon e François Boucher se concentram em examinar os fundamentos de uma abordagem cujo enfoque principal é a participação de todos em uma sociedade francófona e plural. A implantação deste programa é situada, inicialmente, no contexto mais amplo da instauração de regimes pluralistas nas democracias liberais e, então, do refluxo que estas sociedades registraram contra o reconhecimento do pluralismo cultural e religioso na virada dos anos 2000. Os autores apresentam, em seguida, as grandes etapas do desenvolvimento do modelo quebequense de gestão da diversidade, desde a redefinição da maioria de origem canadense-francesa como pilar de uma sociedade francófona de acolhida, até a formulação progressiva de um âmbito decididamente cívico de coabitação. Evitando, até o presente momento, a armadilha do retorno ao assimilacionismo, como é o caso em várias sociedades europeias, este âmbito será tanto mais promissor quanto ele continuar a apostar na inclusão, na luta contra a discriminação e no intercâmbio sustentado entre cidadãos de diferentes origens. Assim, o desenvolvimento da abordagem quebequense em matéria de integração deve, hoje, passar pelo aprofundamento das práticas que favoreçam o diálogo entre os diferentes componentes da sociedade quebequense, a luta pela justiça social e a busca de uma maior igualdade cidadã. Palavras chaves: Quebec. Diversidade Etnocultural. Laicidade. Interculturalismo. Imigração.Abstract: The current text retraces, in the light of the international context, the québécois path in terms of integration and management of diversity. Highlighting the different tendencies that marked the evolution of the politics and initiatives of the State of Quebec since the mid 1960’, Alain-G. Gagnon and François Boucher reconsiders the main foundations of an approach whose mainly focus is to ensure the participation of all in a francophone and plural society. The implementation of this program is placed, initially, in the larger context of the deployment of pluralists regimes in the liberal democracies and, later, in the blacklash against the recognition of the cultural and religious pluralism that those societies registered in the early 2000’. The authors present, then, the major phases of the development of the Quebec model on the management of diversity, from the redefinition of the majority sharing a French-Canadian heritage as a pillar of a francophone host society, up to the progressive formulation of a framework deliberately civilian of cohabitation. Avoiding until now the pitfalls of a return to the policies of assimilation, as we can see in some European societies, this framework will be more promising if it will be able to continue to invest in the inclusion, the struggle against discrimination and solid exchanges between citizens from different backgrounds. Thereby, the development of a Québécois approach to integration must focus nowadays in enhance the practices favouring the dialog between different components of Quebec’s society, the pursuit social justice and the quest of a greater citizenship equality. Keywords: Québec. Ethnocultural diversity. Secularism. Interculturalism. Immigration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".