Les conséquences de la mise en œuvre du motu proprio Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus par les tribunaux ecclésiastiques au Canada, RDC 67/1, 2017
Bibliographic record
Abstract
EnglishThe motu proprio Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus and the decision made by Pope Francis to remove compulsory appeal during affirmative causes and the application of the proximity principle lead the Canadian Episcopal Conference to revise the existence of a one and only tribunal of appeal in the whole country that had been set up at the beginning of the century. Before reaching a decision, the members of the Conferences voted for maintaining the statu quo for a year. They face now two options: either a court of second instance for each ecclesiastical regions or such a court for each geographical regions of the Conferences. Since there are only very few formal appeals, it is very likely that the statu quo will remain. francaisLe motu proprio mitis judex et la decision du Pape Francois d’eliminer l’appel obligatoire pour les causes affirmatives ainsi que l’application du principe de proximite a conduit la Conference des eveques canadiens a revoir l’existence d’un seul tribunal d’appel pour tout le pays tel que depuis le debut des annees 2000. Avant de rendre une decision les membres de la Conference ont vote en faveur du statu quo pour une annee. Deux autres option s’offrent a eux: un tribunal de seconde instance par province ecclesiastique ou un tel tribunal dans chacune des regions geographiques de la Conference. Etant donne le petit nombre d’appels formels, Il semble bien qu’on optera pour conserver le statu quo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".