MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2747918114 · doi:10.1089/dia.2017.0204

Stability of Commercially Available Glucagon Formulation for Dual-Hormone Artificial Pancreas Clinical Use

2017· article· en· W2747918114 on OpenAlexafffund
Nadine Taleb, Adèle Coriati, Christian Khazzaka, Jonathan Bayonne, Virginie Messier, Rémi Rabasa‐Lhoret

Bibliographic record

VenueDiabetes Technology & Therapeutics · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPancreatic function and diabetes
Canadian institutionsDiabetes QuébecDiabetes CanadaUniversité de MontréalMontreal Clinical Research Institute
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institutes of HealthNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesNovo NordiskEli Lilly and Company
KeywordsMedicineArtificial pancreasGlucagonDiabetes mellitusPancreasDual (grammatical number)HormoneIntensive care medicineInternal medicineEndocrinologyType 1 diabetes

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Available glucagon formulations are approved for immediate use after reconstitution for severe hypoglycemia emergency treatment. However, they are used in dual-hormone artificial pancreas (insulin and glucagon) studies through subcutaneous infusion pumps over 24 h. Chemical and physical stability of such glucagon use have not been reported in a comprehensive manner. Materials and Methods: Recombinant Glucagon DNA (Eli Lilly) was used. Compatibility and sterility of glucagon delivery through subcutaneous pump systems were verified. Glucagon degradation through liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), fibrillation using intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence shift, and bioactivity through a cell-protein kinase A-based fluorescent bioassay were assessed over a range of different physical conditions (temperature, movement, and air bubbles). Results: Subcutaneous infusion pump systems administered glucagon in sterile conditions and with comparable accuracy to insulin delivery; mean absolute relative difference of actual versus expected weights were 1.2% ± 1.1% for glucagon and 1.1% ± 0.5% for insulin ( P = 0.9). In comparison to freshly reconstituted samples, glucagon analyzed through LC-MS/MS was intact at 93.0% ± 7.0% after 24 h ( P = 0.42) and 83.04% ± 6.0% after 48 h ( P = 0.02) of incubation in pumps at 32°C. Peak wavelengths for Trp fluorescence did not differ from samples exposed to air bubbles or movement whether incubated (in infusion sets for 24 h at 32°) immediately or 24- and 48-h poststorage at 4°C ( P = 0.10, 0.70 and 0.80, respectively) and no significant differences in bioactivity (shifts in EC 50 ) were found for the same conditions ( P = 0.13, 0.83, and 0.63). Conclusion: Available glucagon formulations are chemically and physically stable, as well as compatible with delivery through subcutaneous infusion pumps over 24 h and can be used in long-term clinical trials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.146
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiabetes Technology & TherapeuticsSame topicPancreatic function and diabetesFrench-language works237,207