MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 13260: Trends in Survival From In-hospital Cardiac Arrests During Nights and Weekends

2016· article· en· W2747978244 on OpenAlexaff
Uchenna R. Ofoma, Suresh Basnet, Andrea Berger, H. Lester Kirchner, Saket Girotra

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Canadian institutionsBerger (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEmergency medicineCardiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: In-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) survival is worse during nights and weekends. Although survival and neurologic outcomes after IHCA have improved in recent years, it remains unknown whether the above trends are consistent in patients with IHCA during nights and weekends. Methods: We identified 151,071 adults at 470 U.S. hospitals in the Get with the Guidelines-Resuscitation registry during 2000-2014. Using multivariable logistic regression with generalized estimating equations, we examined temporal trends in survival to discharge and determined whether trends in IHCA differed during on-hours (Monday - Friday 7:00 am - 10:59 pm) vs. off-hours (Monday - Friday 11:00 pm - 6:59 am, Saturday-Sunday, all day). We also examined acute resuscitation and post-resuscitation survival as secondary outcomes. Results: Among 151,071 participants, 79,091 (52.4%) had an IHCA during off-hours. Risk-adjusted survival proportions improved over time in both groups ( on-hours : 16.0% in 2000, 25.2% in 2014; off-hours : 11.9% in 2000, 21.9% in 2014; P for trend < .001 for both). However, temporal trends in survival did not differ between on-hours and off-hours both on absolute (P=0.75) and relative scale (P = .059, Table). Acute resuscitation survival improved significantly in both groups ( on-hours : 56.1% in 2000, 71% in 2014; off-hours : 46.9% in 2000, 68.2% in 2014; P for trend < .001 for both) such that difference between on-hours and off-hours narrowed over time (P=0.02 absolute scale, P < .001 relative scale, Table). In contrast, although post-resuscitation survival improved over time in both groups (P for trend < .001), the absolute and relative differences persisted in both groups (Table). Conclusions: Despite a significant temporal reduction in acute resuscitation survival difference for IHCA during on-hours compared to off-hours, differences in overall survival persist between the groups, highlighting an important area for quality improvement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation→French-language works237,207→