MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2748147713 · doi:10.1093/gji/ggx363

Born scattering and inversion sensitivities in viscoelastic transversely isotropic media

2017· article· en· W2748147713 on OpenAlexaff
Shahpoor Moradi, K. A. Innanen

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Journal International · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersScience and Engineering Research Council
KeywordsViscoelasticityTransverse isotropyAnisotropyIsotropyScatteringStandard linear solid modelAttenuationPhysicsSlownessPolarization (electrochemistry)HomogeneousGeologyOpticsComputational physicsSeismologyChemistryStatistical physicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We analyse the scattering of seismic waves from anisotropic-viscoelastic inclusions using the Born approximation. We consider the specific case of Vertical Transverse Isotropic (VTI) media with low-loss attenuation and weak anisotropy such that second- and higher-order contributions from quality factors and Thomsen parameters are negligible. To accommodate the volume scattering approach, the viscoelastic VTI media is broken into a homogeneous viscoelastic reference medium with distributed inclusions in both viscoelastic and anisotropic properties. In viscoelastic reference media in which all propagations take place, wave modes are of P-wave type, SI-wave type and SII-wave type, all with complex slowness and polarization vectors. We generate expressions for P-to-P, P-to-SI, SI-to-SI and SII-to-SII scattering potentials, and demonstrate that they reduce to previously derived isotropic results. These scattering potential expressions are sensitivity kernels related to the Fréchet derivatives which provide the weights for multiparameter full waveform inversion updates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Journal InternationalSame topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion TechniquesFrench-language works237,207