Investigating Potentially Key Residues Which Imparts the Substrate and Regiospecifi city of aFlavonol-Specifi c 3-O-Glucosyltransferase from Grapefruit
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Most naturally-occurring fl avonoids are found in glucosylated form. Glucosyltransferases (GTs) are enzymes that catalyze the transfer of glucose from a high energy sugar donor to an acceptor molecule. Citrus paradisi fl avonol-specifi c glucosyltransferase (Cp-F3-O-GT) is recognized for its rigid substrate and regiospecifi city. In this work, homology modeling, site-directed mutagenesis, and biochemical analyses of the recombinant mutant Cp-F3-O-GT proteins were used to investigate potential amino acid residues that might be responsible for the enzymes strict regiospecifi city while also investigating its substrate specifi city. The single point mutations of three amino acid residues within the grapefruit F3-O-GT identifi ed through sequence alignment and homology modeling were performed. Analyses of the enzyme activity of the recombinant mutant F3-O-GT proteins revealed that the single point mutations of serine 20 to leucine (S20L) and proline 297 to phenylalanine (P297F) rendered the recombinant enzymes inactive with fl avonol substrates at 6% and 12% respectively relative to wild-type. However, the mutation of glycine 392 to glutamate (G392E) remained active and glucosylated the fl avonol acceptors quercein (Km app= 11 μM; Vmax = 5.7 pKat/μg) relative to the wild-type (Km app= 93 μM; Vmax = 41.7 pKat/μg), and kaempferol (Km app= 7 μM; Vmax = 3.8 pKat/μg) relative to the wild-type (Km app = 39 μM; Vmax = 4.2 pKat/ μg). The mutant enzyme also did not show broadened acceptor substrate specifi city as it also favored fl avonols as the preferred acceptor substrate. The optimum pH of the mutant enzyme was 8.0 similar to the wild-type F3-O-GT. Activity of the mutant enzyme was stimulated by NaCl and KCl, but inhibited by Cu2+, Zn2+, Fe2+ as well as UDP with an apparent Ki of 10μM. Product identifi cation to determine glucosylation position is being investigated for a possible change in regiospecifi city.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".