PADI2-Mediated Citrullination Promotes Prostate Cancer Progression
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Onset of castration-resistance prostate cancer (CRPC) after long-term androgen deprivation therapy remains a major obstacle in the treatment of prostate cancer. The peptidylarginine deiminase PADI2 has been implicated in chronic inflammatory diseases and cancer. Here we show that PADI2 is an androgen-repressed gene and is upregulated in CRPC. PADI2 expression was required for survival and cell-cycle progression of prostate cancer cells, and PADI2 promoted proliferation of prostate cancer cells under androgen-deprived or castration conditions in vitro and in vivo. Cytoplasmic PADI2 protected the androgen receptor (AR) against proteasome-mediated degradation and facilitated AR binding to its target genes after nuclear translocation and citrullination of histone H3 amino acid residue R26. In contrast, mutant PADI2 D180A failed to affect AR stability, nuclear translocation, or transcriptional activity. PADI2 mediated AR control in a manner dependent on its enzymatic activity and nuclear localization, as correlated with increased histone H3 citrullination. Notably, coadministration of the PADI inhibitor Cl-Amidine and the AR signaling inhibitor enzalutamide synergized in inhibiting CRPC cell proliferation in vitro and tumor growth in vivo. Overall, our results establish PADI2 as a key mediator for AR in prostate cancer progression, especially CRPC, and they suggest PADI as novel therapeutic targets in this disease setting. Cancer Res; 77(21); 5755–68. ©2017 AACR.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".