MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2749073309 · doi:10.1190/segam2017-17742951.1

Massive 3D seismic data compression and inversion with hierarchical Tucker

2017· article· en· W2749073309 on OpenAlexaff
Yiming Zhang, Curt Da Silva, Rajiv Kumar, Felix J. Herrmann

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersShell BrasilSENAI CIMATEC
KeywordsInversion (geology)GeologyCompression (physics)SeismologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Modern-day oil and gas exploration, especially in areas of complex geology such as fault belts and sub-salt areas, is an increasingly expensive and risky endeavour. Typically long-offset and dense sampling seismic data are required for subsequent shot based processing procedures, e.g. wave-equation based inversion (WEI) and surface-related multiple elimination (SRME). However, these strict requirements result in an exponential growth in data volume size and prohibitive demands on computational resources, given the multidimensional nature of the data volumes. Moreover the physical constraints and cost limitations impose restrictions on acquiring fully sampled data. In this work, we propose to invert our large-scale data from a set of subsampled measurements, resulting in an estimate of the true volume in a compressed low-rank tensor format. Rather than expanding the data to its fully-sampled form for later downstream processes, we demonstrate how to use this compressed data directly via on-the-fly common shot or receiver gathers extraction. The combination of massive compression and fast on demand data reconstruction of 3D shot or receiver gathers leads to a substantial reduction in memory costs but with minimal effects on results in the subsequent processing procedures. We demonstrate the effective implementation of our proposed framework on full-waveform inversion on a 3D seismic synthetic data set generated from a Overthrust model. Presentation Date: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 Start Time: 10:35 AM Location: 361F Presentation Type: ORAL

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion TechniquesFrench-language works237,207