Laboratory-Scale Investigation of Sorption Kinetics of Methane/Ethane Mixtures in Shale
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Natural gas produced from shales is composed primarily of methane (CH 4 ), accounting for up to 87–96 mol %. In addition to CH 4, shale gas contains a host of secondary components, including nitrogen (N 2 ), helium (He), and hydrocarbons such as ethane (C 2 H 6 ) and propane (C 3 H 8 ). CH 4 and the other hydrocarbons are thought to be stored in the adsorbed state in the micropores and mesopores of the shale, and as free gas in the (natural) fracture networks. Although convective transport and diffusive transport account for the short-term behavior during shale gas production, desorption is thought to dominate the long-term dynamics of shale gas production. The key objective of this study, therefore, is to investigate the sorption kinetics of methane/ethane mixtures in gas shales. Specifically, we study here the adsorption/desorption behavior of pure CH 4 and C 2 H 6, and their mixtures in a whole shale sample (cube) using thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). The choice of ethane is because it is, typically, the second largest component of shale gas and is thought to compete for the same adsorption sites as methane. To this end, we first determine the steady-state isotherms of the pure component gases and their binary mixtures, which are essential to predicting the gas storage capacity of the shale. We then study the dynamics toward equilibrium during the sorption process in order to better understand the role of desorption during the later times of shale gas production. We apply the well-established Langmuir approach to analyze and interpret the experimental dynamic sorption observations. Our experimental data predict a lag in ethane production relative to that of methane due to the preferential sorption of ethane on the shale. This provides for added insight into interpreting field-scale production data in terms of the produced gas compositions. The experimental observations and their analysis pave, therefore, a path toward improving the interpretation of production data from shale gas operations via an enhanced understanding of desorption dynamics (and subsequent mass transfer) of gas mixtures in shale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".