MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2749292351 · doi:10.1071/aj09021

Unusual reservoir connectivity revealed by data integration at the Sunrise field

2010· article· en· W2749292351 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe APPEA Journal · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geophysical Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of British ColumbiaShell CanadaUniversity of WaterlooConocoPhillips
KeywordsSunriseGeologyTectonicsField (mathematics)Fault (geology)FaciesNatural gas fieldPaleontologyNatural gasEngineeringAtmospheric sciences

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Sunrise gas-condensate field located in the Timor Sea is part of a planned liquefied natural gas (LNG) development. It is a broad, low-relief structure covering approximately 900 km2 with two main reservoirs in the Plover Formation. While previous studies suggested that the Sunrise field was likely well connected, there still existed a downside risk of compartmentalisation because of the high degree of faulting. New results from a multi-disciplinary investigation indicate that the Sunrise field is unusually well connected, both vertically and laterally across large distances of possibly up to 40 km. This is primarily because of the nature of the main reservoir, which is thought to be a laterally extensive shoreface facies, and the presence of conductive fault/fracture zones associated with fault reactivation in an active tectonic setting. The results of this study render unlikely the downside case of a highly compartmentalised field. Despite the relatively wide appraisal well spacing, there is confidence in these conclusions because of the consistent message obtained from the evaluation of a wide range of data. The combination of geochemistry and the modelling of convective mixing through geological time—a method rarely used in the past—give important insights not typically available from traditional methods. This work was also used to successfully guide further data collection, which has supported the initial conclusions regarding the degree of communication across the field.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.454
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it