Single-nucleotide polymorphism data describe contemporary population structure and diversity in allochronic lineages of pink salmon (<i>Oncorhynchus gorbuscha</i>)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pink salmon, the most abundant Pacific salmon, have an obligate 2-year life cycle that leads to reproductively isolated even- and odd-year lineages. Using new and existing data, we examined the genetic structure of both lineages across their distributional range by genotyping 16 681 single-nucleotide polymorphisms for 383 individuals originating from seven pairs of even- and odd-year populations. Distinct differences in standing pools of genetic variation were identified between the lineages; we observed higher levels of heterozygosity, allelic richness, and significantly more private alleles in the odd-year lineage. However, the patterns of population structure were concordant between lineages: the Asian and northern Alaska populations displayed little differentiation but differed significantly from populations in southcentral Alaska and the Pacific Northwest. Our population structure results, in the context of known paleoecological information, suggest that both lineages occupied a northern Beringial refugium as well as a Cascadian refugium in North America during the Last Glacial Maximum. These results highlight the influence of historical patterns of habitat availability on contemporary population structure and support the hypothesis of a pre-glacial origin of the lineages.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".