MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2749666257 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofx163.206

Carbapenemase Gene Transfer among Canadian Patients Colonized or Infected with Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae

2017· article· en· W2749666257 on OpenAlexaffabout
Nancy Matic, Alex Marchand‐Austin, Emily Borgundvaag, Allison McGeer, Samir N. Patel

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAntibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
Canadian institutionsSinai Health SystemPublic Health OntarioUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnterobacteriaceaeMedicineCarbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceaeCarbapenemMicrobiologyGene transferPlasmidGeneEnterobacteriaceae InfectionsBiologyEscherichia coliAntibioticsGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) has been declared an emerging global health threat. Plasmid transfer between species is of particular concern, allowing carbapenem resistance to spread rapidly to invasive or hypervirulent organisms which could potentially lead to severe infections. The rate of carbapenemase gene transfer between species has not been quantified to date. CPE isolates from 754 patients whom had either clinical or surveillance specimens submitted to our reference laboratory between January 2011 and December 2016 were reviewed. Patients with multiple Enterobacteriaceae species possessing the same carbapenemase gene were analyzed. Additionally, we reviewed data from a study in which rectal and groin swabs were collected from 88 patients at 3-month intervals to determine the average duration of CPE colonization prior to gene transfer. Thirty-nine out of 754 patients (5.2%) showed evidence of carbapenemase gene transfer between species. The majority (34/39 patients, 87.2%) had specimens submitted at a single point in time. Most commonly, multiple species with the same carbapenemase gene were found in rectal swabs (25/286 CPE-positive rectal swabs, 8.7%) followed by urine cultures (3/327 CPE-positive urine cultures, 0.9%). In the follow-up study, 8/88 patients with at least one follow-up specimen (9.1%) showed evidence of gene transfer over time. Out of a total of 10 instances of gene transfer, 3, 2, 3, 1, and 1 were detected at the 1-, 3-, 6-, 9-, and 15-month follow-up periods, respectively. Distribution of species and gene types was similar among the index isolates and second isolates (Table 1). Distribution of CPE isolates in the follow-up study A significant minority of CPE-colonized patients will be colonized with multiple species of Enterobacteriaceae. Gene transfer to new species continues to occur over time in persistently colonized patients. All authors: No reported disclosures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.114
Threshold uncertainty score0.229

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Forum Infectious DiseasesSame topicAntibiotic Resistance in BacteriaFrench-language works237,207