MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2750665081 · doi:10.18433/j3p36g

Conference 2017: From Innovation to Patient Solution. An international symposium held jointly by CSPS and CC-CRS, May 10-12, 2017, Montréal, QC Canada

2017· article· en· W2750665081 on OpenAlexfundvenueaboutno aff
Beverley Christina Berekoff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBiotechnology and Related Fields
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFaculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of AlbertaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaKing Saud UniversityUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsAgency (philosophy)Session (web analytics)ManagementLibrary scienceRegulatory agencyEngineeringPolitical scienceSociologyPublic administrationBusinessComputer scienceSocial scienceEconomicsAdvertising

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Plenaries and Special Presentations:Bettina Hamelin, NSERC: Positioning Canada to Lead: Come Together, Right Now!Frank Béraud, CEO, Montréal InVivo: Competitiveness of Quebec Life Sciences: How do we Compare to the Best? Jason Moffat, University of Toronto: Genome-scale CRISPR Screens and Protein Engineering for Target Discovery and TranslationMarcel Bally, BC Cancer Agency - CSPS Leadership Award: Lipids, Drugs and Metals: Ingredients for Promising Anticancer DrugsMohsen Sadatsafavi, University of British Columbia - GSK Early Career Award Lecture: Respiratory Evaluation Sciences Program (RESP): Innovations in Analytic Approaches to Improve Efficiency in Respiratory CareConference Sessions:Special Session: Innovation and Development of Modern Pharmaceuticals1. Immuno-Oncology2. Crossing Biological Barriers3. Translational Medicine4. Key Regulatory Issues5. What is Happening in Antibacterials?6. Gene Therapy7. Biosimilars8. Orphan Diseases

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.466
Threshold uncertainty score0.982

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical SciencesSame topicBiotechnology and Related FieldsFrench-language works237,207